Hugging Face Blog

LAVE: Zero-shot VQA Evaluation on Docmatix with LLMs - Do We Still Need Fine-Tuning?

arXiv Machine Learning
Sep 14

What Drives Recovery in Agentic Text-to-Cypher? LAST-CQ: An LLM Agent Self-Refinement Framework

The paper introduces LAST-CQ, a five-agent, training‑free, execution‑grounded framework for Text‑to‑Cypher that evaluates which components of an agentic pipeline contribute most to performance. Experiments on 2,471 live‑database queries across six backbones show that removing correction reduces execution‑BLEU by 3.1–12.3%, while substituting schema‑grounded feedback with raw error strings has negligible impact. Parallel sampling degrades quality by 10–11%, whereas failure detection and retry routing recover 91.7% of initially failed queries, highlighting that simple failure handling is more effective than sophisticated feedback or increased sampling.

By Ioannis Prokopiou, Athanasios Aidinis, Panagiotis-Christos Kyrmpatsos, Pantelis Vikatos
arXiv Computation and Language
Sep 23

Retrieved-Span Training for Efficient Query-Focused Meeting Summarization on QMSum

The paper introduces a retrieved‑span training approach for query‑focused meeting summarization on the QMSum benchmark. By fine‑tuning a 406 M Fusion‑in‑Decoder model on 2,000‑word retrieved spans, the authors recover a 6.30 ROUGE‑1 loss incurred when moving from capped long input and achieve a test score of 36.33 ROUGE‑1, comparable to a larger 1.2 B system. The smaller model uses roughly one‑third the parameters and less than half the peak inference memory, while span‑regime fine‑tuning adds significant gains over the baseline. "whyItMatters":"The study demonstrates that efficient, smaller models can match or exceed larger systems on QMSum using span‑based fine‑tuning, offering a practical path for scalable query‑focused meeting summarization."

By Edward Xi Yang (Ertas AI)
arXiv Computation and Language
Aug 31

Benchmarking LLM-as-a-Judge for Long-Form Output Evaluation

The paper introduces LongJudgeBench, a benchmark designed to evaluate large language models (LLMs) acting as judges for long-form text generation. It highlights that long-form evaluation requires complex, document-level assessments beyond simple length, such as organization, coverage, depth, consistency, and scenario-specific quality. Experiments show a significant reliability gap among current LLM judges, indicating instability across scenarios and limited effectiveness of rubrics or references.

By Junjie Chen, Yuxi Dong, Haitao Li, Weihang Su, Yujia Zhou, Min Zhang, Yiqun Liu, Qingyao Ai