arXiv AI

A Simple Doxastic Deontic Logic for Norm-Guided Decision Making

The paper presents a doxastic deontic logic designed for autonomous decision‑making under conflicting norms and uncertain information. It extends Chellas' Minimal Deontic Logic with explicit conditional norms and integrates it with multi‑agent KD45 to allow norms to depend on agents’ beliefs about facts and other norms. The authors formulate a Doxastic Norm Compliance Optimization Problem, distinguishing subjective from objective optimization, and identify conditions where the two coincide and where optimal decisions can be computed via weighted partial MaxSAT in polynomial time.

arXiv AI
Sep 15

Moral Rebel Agents: Decision-Making Under Conflicting Obligations

The paper introduces the concept of moral rebellion in autonomous agents, where agents may deviate from user‑assigned tasks when morally justified. Five agent architectures are formalized: an amoral agent, utilitarian agents, deontic agents, utilitarian‑deontic (UD) agents, and dutiful agents. Experiments in a Mini Search‑and‑Rescue domain show distinct trade‑offs among task completion, rescue outcomes, and norm compliance, highlighting the role of commitment‑aware moral reasoning.

By Hector Munoz-Avila, David W. Aha, Paola Rizzo
arXiv AI
Jun 4

DAR: Deontic Reasoning with Agentic Harnesses

arXiv:2606. 05009v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Deontic reasoning is the task of answering questions by applying explicit rules and policies to case-specific facts, for example computing tax liability under a statute or determining the outcome of an immigration appeal.

By Guangyao Dou, William Jurayj, Nils Holzenberger, Benjamin Van Durme
arXiv AI
Oct 31

Deogen: Automatic Benchmark Generation for Reasoning over Policies

DeoGen is an automatic, scalable, and parametric benchmark generator for deontic reasoning, which involves applying policy rules to facts to determine verdicts. It autoformalizes policy rules into first‑order logic, builds decision trees whose paths become benchmark entries, and produces combinatorially many entries per tree depth. Evaluations show state‑of‑the‑art models achieve 89‑92% accuracy on verdict‑determining paths but only 22‑40% on paths lacking sufficient information, even when instructed to abstain.

By Sam Kouteili, William Liang, Keeran Murray, Adriana Zhou, Ramesh Viswanathan, Scott Shapiro, Ruzica Piskac
arXiv Machine Learning
Aug 18

The Ethical Decision Head: Operationalizing Normative Ethics in Autonomous Vehicles via Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback

arXiv:2608. 16710v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: As autonomous vehicles (AVs) approach Level 4 and Level 5 operational capability [SAE International, 2018], their on- board decision systems must handle not only safety-critical locomotion but also their subsequent moral weight.

By Thomas Mbrice, Ammar Ali, Sami Mian, Khai Hern Low, Eric Chen, Arshia Aghajani, Wolf Sch\"afer, Amin Shirangi
arXiv AI
Jul 20

From Black Box to Executable Logic: Explainable Reinforcement Learning through Prolog Expert Systems

arXiv:2607. 15459v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: A trained deep reinforcement learning policy is a black box, and we ask whether it can be made explainable by rewriting it as an executable logic program that reproduces its behaviour and that a person can read, a logic engine can run, and an optimizer can edit.

By Eduardo C. Garrido-Merch\'an
arXiv AI
Jul 2

Mechanical Conscience: A Mathematical Framework for Dependability of Machine Intelligence

arXiv:2605. 03847v3 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Distributed collaborative intelligence (DCI), encompassing edge-to-edge architectures, federated learning, transfer learning, and swarm systems, creates environments in which emergent risk is structurally unavoidable: locally correct decisions by individual agents compose into globally unacceptable behavioral trajectories under uncertainty.

By Munkhdelgerekh Batzorig, Purevbaatar Ganbold, Kyungbin Park, Pilkong Jeong, Kangbin Yim
arXiv AI
Jul 24

Explainable Belief Harmonization under Dynamic Epistemic Partitions

arXiv:2607. 21210v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Existing approaches to multi-agent belief combination have established mature foundations for combining uncertain beliefs under common assumptions: consensus methods use iterative averaging, logic-based methods resolve conflicting knowledge bases, and epistemic logic analyzes agents' information states.

By Adam Kostka (Warsaw University of Technology), Jaros{\l}aw A. Chudziak (Warsaw University of Technology)
arXiv AI
Jun 12

Mechanical Conscience: A Mathematical Framework for Dependability of Machine Intelligenc

arXiv:2605. 03847v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Distributed collaborative intelligence (DCI), encompassing edge-to-edge architectures, federated learning, transfer learning, and swarm systems, creates environments in which emergent risk is structurally unavoidable: locally correct decisions by individual agents compose into globally unacceptable behavioral trajectories under uncertainty.

By Munkhdegerekh Batzorig, Purevbaatar Ganbold, Kyungbin Park, Pilkong Jeong, Kangbin Yim