arXiv:2604. 26977v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: In response to a concern raised by Horty, this paper develops a two-tiered, preference-based semantic framework for modeling defeasible conditional obligations.
Summary generated by The Flow from the publisher's feed. The full article lives at arXiv AI.
arXiv:2606. 03655v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Recent work in defeasible reasoning has seen notions of preferential semantics and entailment in the style of Kraus et al.
Recent work in defeasible reasoning has seen notions of preferential semantics and entailment in the style of Kraus et al. applied to modal logics.
arXiv:2601. 14271v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Shared accountability records are often used by parties who may never agree about causation, responsibility, or normative interpretation.
arXiv:2003. 05746v5 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: In this paper, we explore the issue of inconsistency handling over prioritized knowledge bases (KBs), which consist of an ontology, a set of facts, and a priority relation between conflicting facts.
arXiv:2607. 21201v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: While the integration of linear constraints has significantly expanded the reach of Answer Set Programming (ASP), existing hybrid solvers often rely on disparate semantic underpinnings that lack a unified logical foundation.
arXiv:2606. 08503v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: In this paper, we integrate the defeasible logic of Kraus, Lehmann and Magidor (KLM) with the standpoint logic framework of G\'omez \'Alvarez and Rudolph.