The paper presents an agent‑based model of daily multimodal mobility in Toulouse, comparing fifteen decision‑making approaches—including generative agents (GAs) with minimal and tuned prompts, simple baselines, survey‑fitted models, and a typed classifier—against real household travel survey data. Results show that GAs with tuned prompts approximate the modal split of a simulated day without disruptions but fall short on trip‑by‑trip accuracy, while the Jev‑1.13 TypeSafe classifier performs surprisingly well, indicating that generating output text is not essential. The study highlights the potential and current limitations of generative agent‑based modelling for urban mobility.
By Yves Bru, Kamaldeep Singh Oberoi, Benoit Gaudou
arXiv:2509.09710v3 Announce Type: replace-cross
Abstract: This study introduces a Large Language Model (LLM) scheme for generating key attributes of travel diaries in agent-based transportation model...
By Sepehr Golrokh Amin, Devin Rhoads, Fatemeh Fakhrmoosavi, Nicholas E. Lownes, John N. Ivan
The paper evaluates how Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) can improve Large Language Model (LLM) predictions of travel mode choice. Four retrieval strategies—basic RAG, balanced retrieval, cross‑encoder re‑ranking, and a combination of balanced retrieval with cross‑encoder—are tested on three LLMs (GPT‑4o, o4‑mini, o3) using 2023 Puget Sound travel survey data. Results show that RAG boosts accuracy across models, with GPT‑4o plus balanced retrieval and cross‑encoder achieving 80.8% accuracy, surpassing traditional statistical and machine learning baselines and demonstrating strong zero‑shot transfer.
By Yiming Xu, Junfeng Jiao
arXiv:2606. 01046v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: The development of Large Language Models (LLMs) has significantly improved travel planning applications, yet evaluating such models is limited by existing benchmarks' limitations: 1) overemphasis on constraint compliance, neglecting multi-dimensional qualities like spatio-temporal cost; 2) datasets lacking real-world authenticity and coverage in key areas (e.
By Weiyi Chen, Shuaixiong Wang, Ziyun Gao, Kaichun Hu, Wangze Ni, Shimin Di, Chen Jason Zhang, Lei Chen
arXiv:2604. 10475v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Modeling household-level decisions is central to many real-world applications, including trip planning, residential mobility and migration, disaster management, etc.
By Yuran Sun, Mustafa Sameen, Yaotian Zhang, Rongguan Gu, Mrunal Vibhute, Chia-yu Wu, Yuanyuan Lei, Xilei Zhao
The paper demonstrates that fine‑tuning large language models (LLMs) on local tourist trajectory data can predict visitor movements under varying conditions. Using 566 trajectories from Wakayama Castle Park, Japan, the authors fine‑tuned Llama‑3.1‑8B, achieving 49.1% accuracy for next point‑of‑interest predictions and maintaining strong performance even on undersampled scenarios such as rainy days. This shows that LLMs can serve as high‑fidelity, context‑aware behavior models for tourist prediction and enable counterfactual analysis of mobility interventions.
By Tatsuya Amano, Hirozumi Yamaguchi
The paper introduces the problem of teaching multimodal large language models (MLLMs) to prioritize must‑have requirements over nice‑to‑have ones in autonomous agent tasks. It evaluates current MLLMs on 3,649 realistic service‑scenario problems and finds widespread failures, then proposes First Things First Reinforcement Learning (FTF‑rl) to explicitly optimize reasoning over multi‑priority user requirements, achieving significant performance gains and generalizing to logical and mathematical reasoning benchmarks.
By Tianjie Ju, Xinyue Xu, Wanxuan Sun, Lingxiao Diao, Gongshen Liu, Zhuosheng Zhang, Cheng Yang
The paper introduces a three-tier persona vector to generate diverse, realistic user inputs for evaluating tool-augmented LLM agents. The vector includes 23 dimensions: categorical demographics, continuous behavioral traits, and continuous emotional states, plus a query-complexity overlay. Experiments on 64,698 conversations show that these persona dimensions produce measurable differences in agent performance and realistic scenario-reactive behavior.
arXiv:2606. 11070v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Recent advances in reasoning and tool-calling capabilities of large language models (LLMs) have enabled increasingly capable agentic systems.
By Genta Indra Winata, Amartya Chakraborty, Yuzhen Lin, Swasthi P Rao, Shikhhar Siingh, Houhan Lu, Nadia Bathaee, Sriharsha Hatwar, Paresh Dashore, Anmol Jain, Kshitij Tayal, Xiuzhu Lin, Anirban Das, Sambit Sahu, Shi-Xiong Zhang
arXiv:2607. 17437v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Large language model (LLM) agents offer a generative approach to simulating human behavior under conditions that may have few or no direct historical analogues, a common challenge in disaster and infrastructure-disruption planning.
By Chen Xia, Zexi Kuang, Yuqing Hu
The paper introduces a three-tier persona vector for user simulation in evaluating LLM agents, comprising 23 dimensions across demographics, behavioral traits, and emotional states, plus a query-complexity overlay. It demonstrates that these nuanced personas generate diverse, scenario-reactive conversations, leading to significant variations in agent goal achievement and compliance across different contexts. The model’s design allows for reproducible, auditable user behavior patterns without relying on learned covariance matrices.
By Rahul Khedar, Eshita, Sneha Teja Sree Reddy Thondapu, Mayank Malhotra, Arup Kumar Das, Jitesh Chandra Mishra, Arun Menon, Avinash Karn, Mouli V
Behavior2Trip introduces a new task—Behavior‑Aware Travel Planning—where user preferences are inferred from past behavior trajectories rather than explicit instructions. The benchmark contains 11,400 instances from a major Chinese travel platform, each with nearly 40 recorded behaviors across 14 attributes and 5 preference dimensions. A reinforcement‑learning agent, B2T‑Agent, leverages these trajectories, external retrieval tools, and internal memory, outperforming GPT‑4.1 and other baselines on the dataset.
By Zihao Cheng, Yingyu Shan, Hongru Wang, Zeming Liu, Xinyi Wang, Xiangrong Zhu, Yuhang Guo, Wei Lin, Yunhong Wang