arXiv:2606. 26373v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Dense embeddings power semantic search and retrieval-augmented generation, but embedding-inversion attacks can reconstruct source text from a vector: when a vector database leaks, the documents behind it leak too.
By Sergey Kurilenko
arXiv:2409. 01062v4 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Model Inversion (MI) attacks pose a significant privacy threat by reconstructing private training data from machine learning models.
By Viet-Hung Tran, Ngoc-Bao Nguyen, Son T. Mai, Hans Vandierendonck, Ira Assent, Alex Kot, Ngai-Man Cheung
arXiv:2605. 27292v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Privacy auditing aims to empirically assess privacy leakage in machine learning models using membership inference attacks (MIAs), and to derive lower bounds on differential privacy (DP) parameters.
By Mathieu Dagr\'eou, Aur\'elien Bellet
arXiv:2608.28934v1 Announce Type: new
Abstract: Differential privacy (DP) has traditionally been used to provide theoretical upper bounds on an algorithm's stability to changing its training data. In...
By Saloni Modi, Srivi Balaji, Yusong Zhu, Gautam Kamath, Kevin Tian
arXiv:2607. 27815v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Local differential privacy (LDP) protocols are vulnerable to poisoning attacks.
By Puning Zhao, Zhikun Zhang, Shaowei Wang, Sheng Yue, Bangzhou Xin, Tianhang Zheng, Pengfei Zhang, Xiaochun Cao
arXiv:2609.37344v1 Announce Type: cross
Abstract: Data reconstruction attacks have empirically been successful in recovering training samples from learned models, raising privacy concerns and motivat...
By Max Cairney-Leeming, Simone Bombari, Marco Mondelli
arXiv:2410. 06814v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Over-parameterized models are typically vulnerable to membership inference attacks, which aim to determine whether a specific sample is included in the training of a given model.
By Hengxiang Zhang, Qiang Hu, Hongxin Wei
The paper presents an information‑theoretic framework that derives a distortion bound for reconstruction attacks on models trained with DP‑SGD. The bound can be computed before training and applies even when an adversary observes the training trajectory and knows all other training data. It separates the information leaked by training (conditional mutual information) from the inherent uncertainty in the data (source entropy) and uses rate‑distortion theory to produce a lower bound on expected reconstruction error, instantiated in both pixel and LPIPS feature spaces.
By Henry Bourne, Robert F. Allison
arXiv:2610.07677v1 Announce Type: new
Abstract: In this paper, we show that standard evaluations of high-resolution Model Inversion Attacks (MIAs) significantly underestimate training-data privacy le...
By Shailen Smith, Rasmus Torp, Adam Breuer
In this paper, we show that standard evaluations of high-resolution Model Inversion Attacks (MIAs) significantly underestimate training-data privacy leakage. State-of-the-art privacy defenses, standar...
arXiv:2608. 16236v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Collaborative inference (CI) splits a model between an edge device and a server, whereby the client computes an intermediate activation, transmits it, and the server completes the computation.
By Maximilian Andreas Hoefler, Karsten Mueller, Wojciech Samek
arXiv:2608.29111v1 Announce Type: cross
Abstract: Applications such as personalized assistance and proprietary document analysis require large language models (LLMs) to generate outputs from private...
By Kejia Zhang, Tianyuan Zou, Zixuan GU, Yang Liu