The paper introduces a routing-by-reasoning-need controller for diffusion vision‑language models that dynamically selects early commitment, baseline preservation, or reasoning‑supportive decoding based on trajectory signals such as answer closure, commitment evidence, and representation revision pressure. This training‑free approach avoids a single universal generation length, instead tailoring inference‑time control to the reasoning demands of each question. Experiments on answer‑focused, mixed‑reasoning, and chain‑of‑thought benchmarks show that routed control improves robustness compared to fixed long or short decoding and single‑rule interventions, with benefits not solely due to shorter outputs.
arXiv:2609.05539v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Multimodal large language models (MLLMs) have recently made strong progress in vision-language reasoning, yet their performance often degrades as gen...
arXiv:2607. 11436v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Vision-language models increasingly succeed on multimodal reasoning benchmarks, yet their visual evidence often becomes unstable once it enters the language stack, weakening evidence-grounded reasoning.
arXiv:2606. 29984v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Reinforcement Learning (RL) is an important paradigm for improving the reasoning capabilities of Vision-Language Models (VLMs).
arXiv:2607. 25915v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Complex structured reasoning tasks often require additional computation, yet current language models obtain it mainly by increasing parameter scale or by serializing intermediate steps as chain-of-thought (CoT) tokens.
The paper introduces FlipDir, a training‑free inference‑time technique that mitigates answer flips in vision‑language models by steering hidden states along a low‑rank subspace derived from contrastive image pairs. It employs a margin‑based gate to attenuate steering only during uncertain decoding steps, thereby restoring original predictions while keeping stable ones unchanged. The authors also present VisFlip, a benchmark framework that evaluates models across nine dataset‑variation combinations in scientific reasoning, robot‑scene understanding, and medical VQA, showing that FlipDir consistently outperforms existing methods on recovery and preservation metrics.
arXiv:2609.15131v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Multimodal large language models (MLLMs) require substantial computation to process numerous visual tokens across all transformer layers. Most method...
arXiv:2606. 03965v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Large language models improve final-answer accuracy through extended chain-of-thought reasoning, but often spend tokens inefficiently and offer little inference-time control.
The paper investigates how the order of generating explanations—whether a rationale is produced before or after the answer—affects vision‑language reasoning. By conducting controlled experiments on knowledge‑intensive QA, visual entailment, and compositional grounding tasks, the authors show that larger models are required for reliable rationale‑first generation, while answer‑first generation is less susceptible to format errors. The study concludes that explanation ordering, model scale, pre‑training knowledge, fine‑tuning, and task structure jointly influence prediction accuracy and reasoning faithfulness.
arXiv:2606. 15099v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Existing Vision-Language-Action (VLA) models predominantly rely on explicit Chain-of-Thought (CoT) reasoning to bridge perception and action.
arXiv:2606. 00616v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Recent Vision-Language Models (VLMs) struggle with grounded reasoning, temporal consistency, and context aware planning in videos.
arXiv:2608. 03204v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Post-training reinforcement learning (RL) algorithms are commonly used to align large vision-language models (LVLMs) with human intent and the requirements of visual reasoning tasks.
The paper introduces a framework that combines world models, which generate concrete visual rollouts of possible futures, with multimodal large language models (MLLMs) that perform abstract reasoning. It proposes a controlled concrete reasoning approach and a new training method called Privileged‑Future On‑Policy Self‑Distillation (PF‑OPSD), which uses ground‑truth future videos as privileged teacher context during training while the student model never sees true futures at test time. Experiments on two human‑verified benchmarks, VRQABench and OpenWorldQA, show that PF‑OPSD improves performance by about 10–11% over baselines and enhances robustness to noisy or conflicting rollouts.