arXiv:2608. 06400v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Reward models are central to learning from human preferences, yet identifying what drives their predictions remains challenging.
arXiv:2606. 04284v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Preference modeling plays a central role in reinforcement learning from human feedback (RLHF), enabling large language models (LLMs) to align with human values.
The paper introduces two token-error supervision methods for sparse mixture-of-experts (MoE) large language models, aligning routing affinities with token-level cross-entropy loss. The first method predicts an error score per expert and uses it to adjust affinities before top‑K selection, while the second directly aligns router affinities to the model’s objective without extra heads or inference changes. Experiments on Granite and ARC‑Challenge show accuracy gains of about 2.3–2.94 percentage points over a parameter‑matched baseline, preserving the native sparse execution budget.
arXiv:2604. 07343v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Pluralistic alignment has emerged as a critical frontier in the development of Large Language Models (LLMs), with reward models (RMs) serving as a central mechanism for capturing diverse human values.
arXiv:2609.33803v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Reward models underpin the alignment of large language models, yet the dominant designs reduce each prompt--response pair to a point estimate...
Sparse mixture-of-experts (MoE) language models route each token to multiple experts, suggesting a geometric account of their benefit: co-selected experts should contribute distinct representation directions. Existing evidence often conflates route coherence, candidate quality, and candidate-by-context interaction.
arXiv:2606. 02578v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Recent multimodal large language models have demonstrated strong reasoning ability, yet their reliability as automated evaluators remains limited by a critical weakness: when visual evidence conflicts with textual cues, MLLM judges tend to reward plausible narratives over perceptually correct answers.
arXiv:2606. 03980v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Reward models (RMs) provide critical feedback signals for LLM post-training, notably in reinforced fine-tuning (RFT) and reinforcement learning (RL) pipelines.
arXiv:2609.36724v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Sparse expert models can distribute traffic evenly while still grouping incompatible training signals within the same experts. We study routing as a gr...
Sparse expert models can distribute traffic evenly while still grouping incompatible training signals within the same experts. We study routing as a gradient-partitioning problem and introduce gradien...
arXiv:2607. 28308v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Sparse mixture-of-experts (MoE) language models route each token to multiple experts, suggesting a geometric account of their benefit: co-selected experts should contribute distinct representation directions.
The paper investigates federated learning where each client’s data consists of unknown mixtures of distinct tasks, a scenario termed compound heterogeneity. It shows that when tasks share a common feature geometry, the optimal model for a mixed client is a convex combination of task‑specific models, motivating input‑dependent routing to specialized experts. The authors propose FedSEE, a method that recovers task experts via a convex program and achieves better performance than baselines, reducing negative transfer by 2.9 points overall and 3.7 points for the worst‑served quartile.
arXiv:2602.20723v3 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Multimodal recommenders combine collaborative behavior with visual and textual item evidence, whose usefulness varies across user-item interactions...