Hugging Face Trending Papers

Beyond Geometric Complementarity: Coherent Overlap in Sparse Mixture-of-Experts Routing

Sparse mixture-of-experts (MoE) language models route each token to multiple experts, suggesting a geometric account of their benefit: co-selected experts should contribute distinct representation directions. Existing evidence often conflates route coherence, candidate quality, and candidate-by-context interaction.

arXiv Machine Learning
Sep 21

IntBMoE: Integrating Block-Level Conditioning into Expert Composition for Full-Participation Mixture-of-Experts

IntBMoE introduces a block‑conditioned mixture‑of‑experts that decouples participation, execution, and materialization by combining dense expert composition with sparse block execution. Each internal layer uses a lightweight hypernetwork to merge all expert bases into a single composed expert, while a router selects only a few blocks per token, keeping compute and memory costs low. Experiments on image classification, language modeling, and sequential recommendation demonstrate consistent performance gains, and the model is deployed in AMap’s generative recommendation system, improving UVCTR by 2.4% in online A/B tests.

By Ran Cheng, Longfei Xu, Zheng Liu, Kaikui Liu, Xiangxiang Chu
arXiv AI
4d ago

Cross-Entropy Guided Routing in Mixture-of-Experts Large Language Models

The paper introduces two token-error supervision methods for sparse mixture-of-experts (MoE) large language models, aligning routing affinities with token-level cross-entropy loss. The first method predicts an error score per expert and uses it to adjust affinities before top‑K selection, while the second directly aligns router affinities to the model’s objective without extra heads or inference changes. Experiments on Granite and ARC‑Challenge show accuracy gains of about 2.3–2.94 percentage points over a parameter‑matched baseline, preserving the native sparse execution budget.

By Yury Nahshan, Nati Daniel, Jacob Goldberger, Yoli Shavit
arXiv AI
Sep 7

When Load-Balancing Goes Too Far: Expert Pruning in Over-Dispersed Mixture-of-Experts Models

The paper examines how expert pruning—removing low‑importance experts in Mixture‑of‑Experts models—fails when the router is over‑dispersed, a condition caused by aggressive load‑balancing that spreads tokens nearly uniformly across experts. In this regime, traditional importance signals from router probabilities collapse, making perplexity an unreliable predictor of downstream accuracy; for example, the lowest‑perplexity pruning on gpt‑oss‑20B harms mathematical reasoning while the highest‑perplexity pruning preserves it. To address this, the authors introduce Minimax Expert Score Allocation (MESA), a domain‑aware method that iteratively boosts scores for the most affected domain, achieving minimal worst‑case degradation across domains and outperforming baseline pruning strategies on multiple benchmarks while reducing memory usage.

By Berkcan Kapusuzoglu, Connor Pryor, Sangwoo Cho, Supriyo Chakraborty, Shi-Xiong Zhang, Sambit Sahu, Milind Naphade
arXiv Machine Learning
Sep 4

Towards a Statistical Understanding of Mixture-of-Experts

The paper presents a statistical framework for Mixture-of-Experts (MoE) models, treating them as localized aggregation systems. It derives oracle risk bounds that separate approximation, expert‑learning, and router‑estimation errors for both dense and sparse routing with evolving experts. The authors also analyze how sparse Top‑K routing balances computational cost with performance, interpret gating geometrically, and explain how shared experts can capture common predictive structure while allowing routed experts to focus on local residuals.

By Siyuan He, Bokai Yang, Jie Hu, Ziwen Gao, Yuhong Yang