arXiv Computation and Language By Zelin Zhao, Junyuan Shang, Tianchi Ma, Shuohuan Wang, Dianhai Yu

Multi-View Latent MoE: Letting Every Router Shape Expert Computation

Read the original on arXiv Computation and Language →

The paper introduces Multi-View Latent MoE, a sparse mixture‑of‑experts architecture that uses multiple independent routers to generate richer selection signals and to modulate expert computation. By aggregating sigmoid scores from these routers, the model selects experts that are strongly favored by one or several routers and mixes their relative scores into each expert’s input, thereby reusing routing preferences for both selection and computation. Experiments on a 24‑layer 10B‑A1B model trained on 708 B tokens show a 1.18‑point improvement in nine‑task downstream mean over the baseline, with the Multi‑Router submodule alone providing a 0.6‑point gain and significantly better alignment between router scores and expert utility. whyItMatters":"The approach demonstrates that leveraging multiple routers can both improve expert selection quality and maintain computational efficiency, leading to measurable downstream performance gains on large‑scale language models."

Machine-generated by The Flow from the publisher's headline and feed description — not written or checked by a human. The full article lives at arXiv Computation and Language.

arXiv Computation and Language
Aug 28

Meta-Learning Where to Allocate Experts: Task-Conditioned Layer-Wise Compression for MoEs

MetaNet is a support‑set controller that predicts, for each layer of a Mixture‑of‑Experts model, an expert‑retention threshold and a bounded routing bias while keeping the backbone, experts, and router frozen. On DeepSeek‑MoE‑16B‑Chat, MetaNet offers a tunable trade‑off between accuracy and expert activation: a conservative setting activates 3.61 experts on average (40% fewer than a fixed k=6) with comparable MMLU accuracy, whereas an aggressive setting activates only 2.28 experts (62% fewer) with a modest accuracy drop. The MMLU‑trained controller also transfers to C‑Eval, activating 2.90 experts on average (52% fewer than fixed k=6) at 0.386 accuracy.

By Rongfeng Wang, Shichao Weng, Zhiqiang Wang, Xinyu Liu, Yang Yi, Peilong Zhou, Hongwei Tang
arXiv Machine Learning
Sep 4

Towards a Statistical Understanding of Mixture-of-Experts

The paper presents a statistical framework for Mixture-of-Experts (MoE) models, treating them as localized aggregation systems. It derives oracle risk bounds that separate approximation, expert‑learning, and router‑estimation errors for both dense and sparse routing with evolving experts. The authors also analyze how sparse Top‑K routing balances computational cost with performance, interpret gating geometrically, and explain how shared experts can capture common predictive structure while allowing routed experts to focus on local residuals.

By Siyuan He, Bokai Yang, Jie Hu, Ziwen Gao, Yuhong Yang
arXiv Machine Learning
Oct 7

MASKerade: Token-Routed Mask Experts for Dense-to-MoE Upcycling

MASKerade is a new dense‑to‑MoE training method that learns experts as sparse subnetworks of a frozen pretrained feed‑forward network (FFN) using binary masks. A token‑level router selects which masked FFNs to execute, and both the router and mask scores are jointly optimized while the underlying FFN weights remain unchanged. In experiments on five vision‑language benchmarks with Qwen and Gemma backbones, a configuration of four 2:4 experts with top‑2 routing achieved the best performance among compared baselines, demonstrating that mask learning over frozen weights is a practical alternative for constructing token‑routed MoE experts.

By Mingyuan Zhang, Yue Bai, Zhongruo Wang, Yupin Huang, Yiyang Huang, Hailing Wang, Huimin Zeng, Yun Fu
arXiv Machine Learning
Sep 21

IntBMoE: Integrating Block-Level Conditioning into Expert Composition for Full-Participation Mixture-of-Experts

IntBMoE introduces a block‑conditioned mixture‑of‑experts that decouples participation, execution, and materialization by combining dense expert composition with sparse block execution. Each internal layer uses a lightweight hypernetwork to merge all expert bases into a single composed expert, while a router selects only a few blocks per token, keeping compute and memory costs low. Experiments on image classification, language modeling, and sequential recommendation demonstrate consistent performance gains, and the model is deployed in AMap’s generative recommendation system, improving UVCTR by 2.4% in online A/B tests.

By Ran Cheng, Longfei Xu, Zheng Liu, Kaikui Liu, Xiangxiang Chu