arXiv:2606. 07841v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Black-box variational inference (BBVI) is a methodology for posterior approximation that relies on stochastic optimization.
By Trevor Campbell, Jonathan H. Huggins, Kyurae Kim, Charles C. Margossian
arXiv:2606. 09856v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Post-training Large Language Models (LLMs) for reasoning typically focuses on deductive tasks such as mathematics and coding where correctness is verifiable.
By Liyi Zhang, Akshay K. Jagadish, Brenden M. Lake, Thomas L. Griffiths
arXiv:2606. 15458v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Variational inference (VI) is a core engine of modern AI, enabling scalable approximate Bayesian learning and uncertainty-aware training of large probabilistic and generative models.
By Yuda Shao, Zhiling Gu, Shan Yu
arXiv:2412. 08951v3 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Scalable algorithms of posterior approximation allow Bayesian nonparametrics such as Dirichlet process mixture to scale up to larger dataset at fractional cost.
By Kart-Leong Lim, Xudong Jiang
arXiv:2608.24195v1 Announce Type: cross
Abstract: Mixture-of-Experts (MoE) models provide a flexible framework for partitioning complex prediction problems into simpler local learning tasks through a...
By Soham Chatterjee, Rwitobroto Dey, Smarajit Bose
arXiv:2607. 24583v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Large scale Bayesian nonparametrics (BNP) learner such as Stochastic Variational Inference (SVI) can handle datasets with large class number and large training size at fractional cost.
By Kart-Leong Lim
The paper introduces a new variational inference framework that uses tangent transformations to handle strongly super‑Gaussian likelihoods across a wide range of probability models. By constructing tangent minorants of the log‑likelihood through convex duality, the method achieves conjugacy with Gaussian priors, enabling tractable inference where traditional approaches struggle. The authors provide algorithmic convergence guarantees and near‑parametric risk bounds, and demonstrate superior scalability and accuracy on both simulated and real‑world datasets compared to existing variational algorithms.
By Somjit Roy, Pritam Dey, Debdeep Pati, Bani K. Mallick
arXiv:2605. 04638v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Uncertainty quantification (UQ) is an important technique for ensuring the trustworthiness of LLMs, given their tendency to hallucinate.
By Mingda Li, Rundong Lv, Xinyu Li, Weinan Zhang, Ting Liu
arXiv:2601. 07944v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Since the turn of the century, approximate Bayesian inference has steadily evolved as new computational techniques have been incorporated to handle increasingly complex, large-scale predictive problems.
By Roy Shivam Ram Shreshtth, Arnab Hazra, Gourab Mukherjee
arXiv:2609.36472v1 Announce Type: new
Abstract: Sequential Model-Based Optimization (SMBO) traditionally relies on Bayesian or ensembling surrogates for uncertainty quantification. While historically...
By Jonas Seng, Bennet Wittelsbach, Kristian Kersting
arXiv:2606. 27171v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: This work addresses the problem of variance in stochastic gradient estimation for machine learning optimization.
By Jonne Pohjankukka, Jukka Heikkonen
The paper introduces a decision‑theoretic framework that splits a large language model’s decision loss into belief formation and action selection components. Using a synthetic benchmark, it evaluates how reinforcement‑learning interventions on beliefs, decisions, or both affect these components across three domains. The study finds that targeting a single component improves that part but may not transfer to others, while jointly targeting both improves both only when training and evaluation formats match.
By Huaman Sun, Dingcheng Wang, Jason Hartline, Jessica Hullman