arXiv:2502. 06434v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Dataset pruning (DP) and dataset distillation (DD) fundamentally differ in their outputs: DP selects original image subsets, while DD generates synthetic images.
By Lingao Xiao, Songhua Liu, Yang He, Xinchao Wang
arXiv:2603. 25144v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Dataset distillation (DD) compresses a large training set into a small synthetic set, reducing storage and training cost, and has shown strong results on general benchmarks.
By Hongxu Ma, Guang Li, Shijie Wang, Dongzhan Zhou, Baoli Sun, Takahiro Ogawa, Miki Haseyama, Zhihui Wang
arXiv:2606. 25488v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Knowledge Distillation (KD) is widely used to obtain compact models for efficient inference in resource-constrained environments.
By Yifan Wu, Yiqi Wang, Xichen Ye, Wenjing Yan, Xiaoqiang Li, Cheng Jin, Xiangyu Yue, Weizhong Zhang
arXiv:2608. 09091v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Transfer learning is particularly useful in settings with limited training data, and within image classification it is common to transfer learn upon massive datasets like ImageNet , CIFAR-100, or COCO .
By Jing Ning, James D. Braza
arXiv:2607. 05891v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Coreset selection aims to identify a small and highly representative subset of a massive dataset for efficient model training.
By Cemil-Andrei Dilmac, Florinel-Alin Croitoru, Radu Tudor Ionescu
arXiv:2608. 16700v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Various machine unlearning techniques have been developed in response to privacy legislation requirements, enabling individuals to exercise their legal right to have their data $D_f$ removed from a machine learning model.
By Hang Zhang, Kaifeng Zhang, Yixiao Ma, Weijie Xu, Ye Zhu, Kai Ming Ting
arXiv:2503. 18314v5 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: We present LoTUS, a novel Machine Unlearning (MU) method that eliminates the influence of training samples from pre-trained models, avoiding retraining from scratch.
By Christoforos N. Spartalis, Theodoros Semertzidis, Petros Daras, Efstratios Gavves
arXiv:2607. 20465v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: The quality of training data fundamentally determines the capabilities of large language models (LLMs), yet no unified benchmark exists to measure how well LLMs, agents, and data-centric workflows actually prepare training data end to end.
By Hao Liang, Qifeng Cai, Yibo Lin, Jianzhuo Du, Qifeng Xia, Sizhe Qiu, Linzhuang Sun, Meiyi Qiang, Zhaoyang Han, Xiaochen Ma, Bohan Zeng, Ruichuan An, Conghui He, Wentao Zhang
arXiv:2606. 08574v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Data pruning (DP), as an oft-stated strategy to alleviate heavy training burdens, reduces the volume of training samples according to a well-defined pruning method while striving for near-lossless performance.
By Chenhan Jin, Shengze Xu, Qingsong Wang, Fan Jia, Dingshuo Chen, Tieyong Zeng
arXiv:2509. 05130v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: In classification problems, models are trained to predict a class label based on the input data features.
By Davide Pirovano, Federico Milanesio, Michele Caselle, Piero Fariselli, Matteo Osella
arXiv:2510. 26714v5 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Machine unlearning aims to remove the influence of certain data points from a trained model without costly retraining.
By Jamie Lanyon, Axel Finke, Petros Andreou, Georgina Cosma
arXiv:2605. 24417v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Supervised classification on tabular data remains a central machine learning task, but its dependence on large labeled datasets limits its applicability in data-scarce settings.
By Daria Grushina, Kseniia Kuvshinova, Alina Kostromina, Aziz Temirkhanov, Mile Mitrovic, Dmitry Simakov