arXiv:2502. 06434v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Dataset pruning (DP) and dataset distillation (DD) fundamentally differ in their outputs: DP selects original image subsets, while DD generates synthetic images.
By Lingao Xiao, Songhua Liu, Yang He, Xinchao Wang
arXiv:2603. 25144v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Dataset distillation (DD) compresses a large training set into a small synthetic set, reducing storage and training cost, and has shown strong results on general benchmarks.
By Hongxu Ma, Guang Li, Shijie Wang, Dongzhan Zhou, Baoli Sun, Takahiro Ogawa, Miki Haseyama, Zhihui Wang
arXiv:2606. 25488v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Knowledge Distillation (KD) is widely used to obtain compact models for efficient inference in resource-constrained environments.
By Yifan Wu, Yiqi Wang, Xichen Ye, Wenjing Yan, Xiaoqiang Li, Cheng Jin, Xiangyu Yue, Weizhong Zhang
arXiv:2407.03463v2 Announce Type: replace-cross
Abstract: In the realm of self-supervised learning (SSL), conventional wisdom has gravitated towards the utility of massive, general domain datasets fo...
By Jes\'us M Rodr\'iguez-de-Vera, Imanol G Estepa, Ignacio Saras\'ua, Bhalaji Nagarajan, Petia Radeva
arXiv:2608. 09091v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Transfer learning is particularly useful in settings with limited training data, and within image classification it is common to transfer learn upon massive datasets like ImageNet , CIFAR-100, or COCO .
By Jing Ning, James D. Braza
The paper investigates how knowledge distillation (KD) applied at intermediate layers of a neural network can affect overfitting and model performance. While traditional KD focuses on the final output, this study explores block‑wise KD across eleven datasets, finding that on standard datasets the last block suffices, but on fine‑grained, data‑scarce settings intermediate supervision significantly improves accuracy. The authors also analyze optimal supervision granularity using attention maps, Centered Kernel Alignment, and Grad‑CAM, and examine teacher‑student fine‑tuning strategies.
By Irene Trigueros-Lorca, Leonardo Concepci\'on, Christian Wagner, Isaac Triguero, Daniel Molina
arXiv:2602.05391v3 Announce Type: replace
Abstract: Dataset distillation seeks to synthesize a compact surrogate dataset that enables performance comparable to training on the original dataset for do...
By Qianxin Xia, Jiawei Du, Yuhan Zhang, Xin Zhang, Xuewan He, Wenbo Jiang, Jielei Wang, Tao Luo, Guoming Lu
arXiv:2607. 05891v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Coreset selection aims to identify a small and highly representative subset of a massive dataset for efficient model training.
By Cemil-Andrei Dilmac, Florinel-Alin Croitoru, Radu Tudor Ionescu
Reference-Guided Machine Unlearning (ReGUn) is a vision unlearning framework that prioritizes distributional indistinguishability over degradation-based heuristics. It uses disjoint held-out data to create a class-conditioned reference distribution for distillation, guiding forget samples toward non-member behavior without explicitly degrading predictions. Experiments across various architectures and datasets show that ReGUn achieves a competitive forgetting–utility trade-off and closely matches retrain-like membership inference behavior.
By Jonas Mirlach, Sonia Laguna, Julia E. Vogt
arXiv:2608. 16700v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Various machine unlearning techniques have been developed in response to privacy legislation requirements, enabling individuals to exercise their legal right to have their data $D_f$ removed from a machine learning model.
By Hang Zhang, Kaifeng Zhang, Yixiao Ma, Weijie Xu, Ye Zhu, Kai Ming Ting
arXiv:2503. 18314v5 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: We present LoTUS, a novel Machine Unlearning (MU) method that eliminates the influence of training samples from pre-trained models, avoiding retraining from scratch.
By Christoforos N. Spartalis, Theodoros Semertzidis, Petros Daras, Efstratios Gavves
arXiv:2607. 20465v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: The quality of training data fundamentally determines the capabilities of large language models (LLMs), yet no unified benchmark exists to measure how well LLMs, agents, and data-centric workflows actually prepare training data end to end.
By Hao Liang, Qifeng Cai, Yibo Lin, Jianzhuo Du, Qifeng Xia, Sizhe Qiu, Linzhuang Sun, Meiyi Qiang, Zhaoyang Han, Xiaochen Ma, Bohan Zeng, Ruichuan An, Conghui He, Wentao Zhang