arXiv:2607. 25961v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Ambivalence and hesitancy (A/H) are conflicting affective states that precede the delay or abandonment of health behaviour change.
arXiv:2604. 11730v4 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Using behavioural science, health interventions focus on behaviour change by providing a framework to help patients acquire and maintain healthy habits that improve medical outcomes.
arXiv:2606. 07433v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Video understanding is being rapidly transformed by multimodal large language models (MLLMs), as research moves from short clips to long, multimodal, and knowledge-intensive video scenarios.
arXiv:2606. 11930v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Predicting psychological traits from asynchronous video interviews (AVIs) is a challenging multimodal learning problem because labeled datasets are limited while each response contains high-dimensional visual, acoustic, and verbal signals.
The paper introduces the Modality Discrepancy Transformer (MDT), a model designed to detect ambivalence and hesitancy in clinical videos by capturing cross‑modal disagreement across facial, vocal, and linguistic signals. MDT expands a 6‑token representation to 9 tokens that include modality embeddings, absolute‑difference features, and Hadamard‑product discrepancy features, which are processed through Transformer self‑attention with FiLM‑based text conditioning and LoRA fine‑tuning. On the BAH dataset from the 3rd ABAW Challenge, MDT achieves a Macro F1 score of 0.7408 on the labelled test split and 0.7368 on the private leaderboard, surpassing the strongest baseline by over 10 points while training in under 20 minutes on a single GPU.
arXiv:2607. 12774v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: This article presents our results for the 11th Affective Behavior Analysis in-the-Wild (ABAW) competition.
arXiv:2609.18323v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Recent Omni-Modal Generative Models (Omni-Models) have advanced content generation toward unified modeling of text, images, video, and audio. MiniMax-H...
arXiv:2607. 14702v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Automatic recognition of ambivalence and hesitancy is challenging because these states may be expressed through inconsistent linguistic, acoustic, facial, and contextual patterns, while top-performing systems often rely on computationally expensive ensembles.
arXiv:2606. 02679v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Multimodal systems often benefit from combining information across language, sound, and visual streams, but this benefit is not guaranteed.
arXiv:2608. 05381v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Current Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) can process diverse sensory inputs, yet their reasoning remains heavily biased toward a dominant modality, resulting in brittle cross-modal reasoning.
HUG‑VIS is a unified multimodal benchmark for human‑centered visual intelligence, comprising 8,400 half‑body videos of 30 professional actors performing 280 emotion‑action prompts in Mandarin. The dataset provides synchronized video, audio, text, and alpha mattes for four tasks—human emotion recognition, video generation, voice cloning, and video matting—allowing evaluation of both open‑ and closed‑source models under a zero‑shot protocol. Results reveal that linguistic cues dominate emotion recognition, visual affect is weakest, and that automatic metrics and human judgments diverge in generation and cloning tasks, while motion‑related boundary fidelity remains a key challenge for matting.
We address ambivalence and hesitancy (A/H) recognition in the ABAW 2026 BAH Challenge: given a short interview video, predict whether the person shows signs of A/H. Our system combines affect-specialised text, audio, and visual representations with a small set of readable linguistic hesitation cues, fused by a reliability gate we call Affective Marker Fusion (AMF), and finished with a simple AP-weighted ensemble at a fixed decision threshold.
arXiv:2606. 11930v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Predicting psychological traits from asynchronous video interviews (AVIs) is a challenging problem in AI-assisted interview assessment because labeled datasets are limited while each response contains high-dimensional visual, acoustic, and verbal signals.