arXiv:2603. 24567v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Constrained optimization in high-dimensional black-box settings is difficult due to expensive evaluations, the lack of gradient information, and complex feasibility regions.
By Raju Chowdhury, Tanmay Sen, Biswabrata Pradhan
arXiv:2606. 02351v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Bayesian optimization (BO) is a popular and effective approach for tuning expensive, noisy experiments, but requires the formulation of an explicit objective function.
By Johanna Menn, Miriam Kober, Paul Brunzema, David Stenger, Sebastian Trimpe
arXiv:2603. 07965v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Bayesian optimization (BO) for high-dimensional constrained problems remains a significant challenge due to the curse of dimensionality.
By Jing Jingzhe, Fan Zheyi, Szu Hui Ng, Qingpei Hu
arXiv:2609.26021v1 Announce Type: new
Abstract: Dynamic black-box optimization presents significant challenges for Bayesian Optimization (BO), as the objective function evolves over time, causing opt...
By Merlin Angel Kelly, Rishan Patel, Alexander Thomas, Ziyue Zhu, Zikun Quan, Tom Carlson, Youngjun Cho
arXiv:2606. 06984v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: This paper presents a general acceleration mechanism for multi-objective Bayesian optimisation (MOBO) that leverages Gaussian process predictive gradients as auxiliary signals.
By Alma Rahat, Tinkle Chugh, Jonathan Fieldsend, Richard Allmendinger
arXiv:2603. 29730v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: We present mlr3mbo, a modular toolbox for Bayesian optimization in R.
By Marc Becker, Lennart Schneider, Martin Binder, Lars Kotthoff, Bernd Bischl
arXiv:2606. 03382v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: While Proximal Policy Optimization (PPO) demonstrates strong performance in stationary settings, we show that its standard optimization paradigm struggles in continual and non-stationary environments.
By Bingxu Liu, Jiashun Liu, Johan Obando-Ceron, Hao Wang, Runze Liu, Pablo Samuel Castro, Aaron Courville, Ling Pan
While Proximal Policy Optimization (PPO) demonstrates strong performance in stationary settings, we show that its standard optimization paradigm struggles in continual and non-stationary environments. The failure does not stem from insufficient model capacity or overly restrictive clipping.
GRAPE is a two‑stage Bayesian optimization framework that first refines the local gradient posterior using a closed‑form acquisition function and then selects update directions by maximizing expected decrease conditioned on descent. The authors prove that the refinement stage monotonically reduces local uncertainty and that the progress‑aware direction converges to true steepest descent as the posterior sharpens. Empirical results show GRAPE achieves a 5.4× speedup on black‑box adversarial attacks and reduces final average regret by 3.8 log‑units on large language model prompt‑optimization tasks.
By Richard Cornelius Suwandi, Feng Yin
The paper presents OGPIT, a trust‑region Bayesian optimization method that uses Gaussian process models and adaptive replication to handle stochastic functions with high variance. By allocating repeated evaluations where most beneficial and incorporating cost‑aware acquisition modifications, the approach scales efficiently when many samples are needed to reduce noise. Numerical experiments demonstrate that adaptive replication improves computational efficiency while maintaining solution accuracy compared to baseline methods.
By Mickael Binois (ACUMES), Jeffrey Larson (ANL)
MF-SCBO is a new multi‑fidelity extension of Scalable Constrained Bayesian Optimization designed for high‑dimensional black‑box functions with black‑box constraints. It handles an arbitrary number of fidelity levels and non‑nested sampling, addressing gaps in existing methods. Experiments on standard benchmarks and challenging problems show that MF‑SCBO generally converges faster than both single‑fidelity SCBO and other multi‑fidelity approaches in high‑dimensional constrained settings.
By Lucas Palazzolo, Micka\"el Binois, La\"etitia Giraldi
arXiv:2607. 10669v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Bayesian optimization is increasingly used to guide data-efficient experimentation in chemistry, materials science, and related laboratory settings, but its practical performance depends strongly on how well surrogate-model assumptions match the geometry and noise structure of the underlying objective.
By L. A. Zhukov, E. V. Shaburova, D. V. Antonets