arXiv:2406. 10090v3 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Thanks to their extensive capacity, over-parameterized neural networks exhibit superior predictive capabilities and generalization.
By Srishti Gupta, Zhang Chen, Luca Demetrio, Fabio Brau, Xiaoyi Feng, Zhaoqiang Xia, Antonio Emanuele Cin\`a, Maura Pintor, Luca Oneto, Ambra Demontis, Battista Biggio, Fabio Roli
arXiv:2606. 27784v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: The existence of adversarial attacks is often attributed to the presence of non-robust features in neural networks.
By Ta\"iga Gon\c{c}alves, Yongsong Huang, Tomo Miyazaki, Shinichiro Omachi
arXiv:2607. 03075v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Safety-critical applications require classifiers that are both robust and reliable.
By Nicolas Sournac, Ahmed Baha Ben Jmaa, Bertrand Braeckeveldt
arXiv:2606. 31653v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Certified training aims to produce models whose predictions can be formally verified against adversarial perturbations, typically by optimising upper bounds on the worst-case loss over an allowed perturbation set.
By Matteo Melis, Jesus Martinez Del Rincon, Vishal Sharma
arXiv:2606. 01746v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Modern neural networks are highly susceptible to adversarial perturbations.
By Kai Wang
arXiv:2606. 00738v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Adversarial Training (AT) is a leading defense against adversarial examples but often suffers from Catastrophic Overfitting (CO) in efficient single-step variants, where robustness to multi-step attacks collapses despite high single-step performance.
By Mazdak Teymourian, Ramtin Moslemi, Farzan Rahmani, Mohammad Hossein Rohban
arXiv:2606. 02267v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: The vulnerability of deep neural networks to adversarial examples poses a significant challenge for real-world deployment.
By Nicolas Stalder, Benjamin F. Grewe, Matteo Saponati, Pau Vilimelis Aceituno
arXiv:2608. 14594v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Projected Gradient Descent (PGD) is widely used to evaluate adversarial robustness, typically via final adversarial accuracy, which does not capture model behaviour throughout the attack.
By Dhairysheel Durgule
The paper introduces the Threat Conditional Network (TCN), a model that achieves robust performance across a continuous range of adversarial threat levels. TCN splits representation learning into a threat‑invariant backbone and a lightweight threat‑conditional adaptor, using Fourier‑based embeddings and channel‑wise affine modulation to condition on perturbation budgets. Experiments on CIFAR‑10, CIFAR‑100, and Tiny‑ImageNet demonstrate that TCN matches or exceeds ensembles of budget‑specialized models while adding only 4.6% more parameters, and it generalizes to unseen budgets and mismatched threat conditions.
By Zhichao Hou, Xiaorui Liu
arXiv:2511. 13749v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Deep neural networks are known to be vulnerable to adversarial perturbations, which are small, carefully crafted inputs that lead to incorrect predictions.
By Ci Lin, Tet Yeap, Iluju Kiringa
arXiv:2510. 02422v4 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Existing gradient-based jailbreak attacks typically optimize a fixed-length adversarial suffix toward a predefined target response with a static optimization strategy.
By Kedong Xiu, Yunhan Yang, Churui Zeng, Tianhang Zheng, Xinzhe Huang, Di Wang, Puning Zhao, Zhan Qin, Kui Ren
arXiv:2607. 04145v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Adversarial attacks guide and provide additional training and test data for both adversarial training and adversarial robustness validation, and expose the 'piecewise linearity' of deep learning based models.
By Naman Goyal, Milan Chaudhari