The paper introduces RAVEL, a retrieval‑aware online reinforcement learning framework designed to improve interactive retrieval under partial evidence. RAVEL begins with supervised question generation, directly observes the top‑4 retrieval candidates, and refines its question policy using rank feedback from the full question‑answer‑retrieval loop. Experiments on the Interactive‑PEDES dataset demonstrate that RAVEL progressively enhances retrieval performance over five interaction rounds, reallocating questioning toward localized open‑ended attributes that yield the greatest gains on challenging queries.
By Lyucheng Qian, John Yuehan Zhang, Pingyu Wang
arXiv:2607. 00017v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Long-term conversational agents are expected to remember past interactions, but memory is useful only when the right evidence is recalled for the right user.
By ZhiShu Jiang, Haibo Liu, Xin Shen, Guanqiang QI, Chenxi Miao, Weikang Li, Liwei Qian, Xin Pei, Jizhou Huang
The paper introduces PersonaLink, a training‑free method that distills a user’s interaction history into a bounded three‑field persona and iteratively refines it by self‑evaluating a frozen 7B language model on held‑out labeled data. Each refinement rewrites the persona only if it does not regress on that slice, ensuring the persona remains bounded and query‑independent. On a 200‑user news categorization task (LaMP‑2), PersonaLink achieves 0.745–0.755 accuracy, statistically indistinguishable from BM25 retrieval’s 0.760–0.765 accuracy, demonstrating that distilled personas can match retrieval for classification but not for regression tasks.
By JaeHa Yoon, Minjun Park, Seoyeon Kim, Jiwoo Lee, Hyunwoo Choi, Dohyun Kang
arXiv:2606. 21097v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Deploying highly capable personalized conversational agents in resource-constrained or privacy-sensitive environments remains a significant challenge.
By Junfeng Liu, Christopher T. Symons, Ranga Raju Vatsavai
arXiv:2607. 03162v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: LLM-powered agents struggle with personalization when users issue raw, underspecified queries.
By Garry Yang, Zizhe Chen, Xinru Chen, Yongqiang Chen, Jianxiang Wang, Deyu Zou, Linyi Ding, Jialiang Wu, Yunzhong He, Yu Gong, James Cheng, Huaixiao Tou
arXiv:2603.27476v3 Announce Type: replace
Abstract: AI-powered people search platforms are increasingly deployed for recruiting, sales prospecting, and professional networking, yet no standardized be...
By Tianyu Shi, Wei Wang, Zequn Xie, Shuai Zhang, Boyang Xia, Chenyu Zeng, Qi Zhang, Lynn Ai, Yaqi Yu, Kaiming Zhang, Feiyue Tang, Zhenyu Yu, Lei Ding
arXiv:2603. 27476v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: AI-powered people search platforms are increasingly used in recruiting, sales prospecting, and professional networking, yet no widely accepted benchmark exists for evaluating their performance.
By Wei Wang, Tianyu Shi, Shuai Zhang, Boyang Xia, Zequn Xie, Chenyu Zeng, Qi Zhang, Lynn Ai, Yaqi Yu, Kaiming Zhang, Feiyue Tang, Lei Ding
The paper introduces VIBE‑Bench, a new benchmark designed to test personalized large language models (PLLMs) in a regime where user profile cues and query‑specific preferences do not share the same conceptual space, a situation termed profile‑preference conceptual misalignment (PRCM). VIBE‑Bench contains 3,504 personas, 12,239 dialogues, and a manually verified gold test set, and includes two psychology‑grounded tasks that require cross‑concept preference reasoning beyond surface semantic overlap. Experiments show that existing PLLMs largely depend on shallow semantic correlations and struggle to learn robust cross‑concept mappings, highlighting PRCM as a distinct failure mode for personalization models.
By Yiwen Jiang, Yang Deng, Stephanie Fong, Zimu Wang, Yaling Shen, Wei Feng, Hongxi Yang, Xiangyu Zhao, Zhongxing Xu, Deval Mehta, Xuelian Cheng, Zongyuan Ge
Q2D-Web is a new large‑scale benchmark for agentic Retrieval‑Augmented Generation (RAG) systems, featuring a 190 million‑document web corpus and 70 k machine‑reformulated search queries in ten languages. It supplies three sets of relevance judgments—agent citations, production rankings, and a combined set enriched with LLM‑based labels—to evaluate first‑stage retrievers. Experiments on 13 retrievers show consistent ranking across judgment sets but significant variation across domains, languages, and query types, and demonstrate that a carefully sampled sub‑corpus can approximate full‑corpus evaluation with minimal loss in Recall@1000.
arXiv:2607. 27816v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Role-playing agents (RPAs) have become one of the most important consumer applications of large language models.
By Yuhang Zhu, Mingxuan Du, Benfeng Xu, Jie Gao, Lingyun Yu, Hongtao Xie
arXiv:2602. 12394v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Personalized prompting offers large opportunities for deploying large language models (LLMs) to diverse users, yet existing prompt optimization methods primarily focus on task-level optimization while largely overlooking user-specific preferences and latent constraints of individual users.
By Yuchen Ma, Yue Huang, Wenjie Wang, Xiaonan Luo, Xiangliang Zhang, Stefan Feuerriegel
The paper introduces ENOUGH, a method for creating minimal sufficient user profiles for personalized language models. ENOUGH iteratively adds behavioral records or stops, evaluating profile prefixes with a counterfactual search that balances downstream gains, user specificity, and token costs. The resulting profiles are distilled into a lightweight controller that orders records and triggers the generator only once, achieving better effectiveness and efficiency than existing baselines across six tasks.
By Minghang Liu, Qiang Qiu, Yuanzhuo Wang, Huawei Shen, Xueqi Cheng