arXiv AI

Retrieval-grounded robot program generation and simulation-based correction via Model Context Protocol

arXiv AI
Jul 1

Embodied CAD: Solver-Grounded LLM Agents for Parametric B-Rep Assembly Modeling

arXiv:2606. 31252v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Large language models can write plausible CAD scripts, but reliable industrial CAD modeling requires more than syntactically valid code: every feature, placement, and assembly relation must be accepted by an exact geometric kernel while remaining editable as parametric boundary representation geometry.

By Fumin Liu, Haoyu Zhou, Fei Hao, Lin Yang
arXiv AI
Sep 15

Bridging Thought and Action: Taming Long-Horizon Instability in Open-Source LLM Agents with a MetaTool-Enhanced ROS Framework

The paper introduces a ROS-Agent architecture that enhances task reliability and execution efficiency for open‑source LLM‑powered robotic agents. It adds a MetaTool that forces the LLM to produce a structured pseudo‑code plan before any action, storing this plan in a scratchpad to separate planning from execution. Experiments on a custom mobile robot show up to ~24% improvement in complex task completion and contextual consistency compared to the baseline.

By Kazi Abrar Mahmud, Nilotpaul Kundu Dhurubo, Tamal Kirttonia, Sabbir Hossain Ujjal, Mohammad Ariful Haque
arXiv AI
Jun 12

LabVLA: Grounding Vision-Language-Action Models in Scientific Laboratories

arXiv:2606. 13578v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Scientific laboratories increasingly rely on AI systems to reason about experiments, but the physical act of doing science remains largely outside their reach.

By Baochang Ren, Xinjie Liu, Xi Chen, Yanshuo Liu, Chenxi Li, Daqi Gao, Zeqin Su, Jintao Xing, Zirui Xue, Rui Li, Xiangyu Zhao, Shuofei Qiao, Minting Pan, Wangmeng Zuo, Lei Bai, Dongzhan Zhou, Ningyu Zhang, Huajun Chen
arXiv AI
Sep 18

AURORA: A Natural Language-Driven Agentic Framework for Understanding, Reasoning, and Orchestrating Reliable Air-Ground Co-Simulation

AURORA is a natural‑language‑driven framework that treats air‑ground scenario generation as a compilation process with verification. It introduces the Air‑Ground Scenario Graph (AGSG), a typed intermediate representation linking agents, missions, events, communication, and success conditions, enabling joint grounding, temporal planning, pre‑execution checks, runtime verification, failure localization, and bounded repair. The authors also present AURORA‑Bench to evaluate not only execution but faithful realization of requested interactions, showing that structured execution and runtime verification improve reliability and that explicit intermediate representations facilitate verifiable and repairable co‑simulation.

By Keshu Wu, Hao Zhang, Rui Gan, Xiangbo Gao, Xiaopeng Li, Zhengzhong Tu, Yang Zhou