arXiv:2606. 01282v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Text-to-Image (TTI) systems are now everyday infrastructure for journalism, education, advertising, and public communication, and the demographic and cultural stereotypes they inherit from training data (rendering women, people of colour, older adults, and non-Western cultures as under-represented or caricatured) become a population-level harm at deployment scale.
arXiv:2512. 04981v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Text-to-image (T2I) systems increasingly rely on Large Language Model (LLM)-based text conditioning to interpret and expand user prompts.
The paper introduces a method called Debias Anything that jointly addresses fairness and diversity in diffusion models without requiring sensitive-attribute annotations. By connecting a frozen diffusion model to a pretrained vision-language embedding space via an adapter, the approach uses pairs of text prompts to guide batch composition toward desired attribute proportions and employs a disagreement score to promote diversity. The method is applicable to both unconditional and text-conditional diffusion models and demonstrates improved quality and diversity while maintaining comparable fairness levels in experiments.
arXiv:2512. 00807v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Vision-Language Models (VLMs) inherit significant social biases from their training data, notably in gender representation.
arXiv:2512. 08724v3 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Text-to-image (TTI) diffusion models have achieved remarkable visual quality, yet they have been repeatedly shown to exhibit social biases across sensitive attributes such as gender, race and age.
arXiv:2607. 21300v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Machine unlearning has emerged as a tool for removing personal data from trained models to comply with recent AI regulations.
arXiv:2607. 15740v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: As Text-to-Image (T2I) systems rapidly advance, evaluating the cultural authenticity of synthesized content has become increasingly important for fair and trustworthy generative AI.
arXiv:2609.24228v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Text-to-image (T2I) models are typically evaluated for bias using slot-based templates such as ``a photo of a [profession]''. Such templates probe only...
arXiv:2602. 06806v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Text-to-image diffusion models achieve impressive generation quality but inherit and amplify training-data biases, skewing coverage of semantic attributes.
FairLens is a benchmark and evaluation framework that measures fairness and validity of vision‑language models (VLMs) in high‑stakes domains such as hiring, legal, and healthcare. It uses over 100,000 face‑image and question pairs covering gender, race, and age, and assesses responses through demographic parity, soundness, demographic association, and bias in free‑text generation. The study finds that VLMs often make unwarranted inferences from faces rather than abstaining, especially in legal and healthcare contexts, and that small parity gaps can still hide unsafe treatment across groups.
Recent advances in multimodal generative models have enabled instruction-based image generation to move beyond semantic manipulation to knowledge-driven visual reasoning. However, these methods focus on explicit commonsense reasoning, shallow causal understanding, and direct knowledge recall, failing at knowledge-intensive generation.
The paper introduces algorithms for aligning the attribute distribution of outputs from black-box generative AI models with a user-specified target. It focuses on minimizing the number of queries needed to achieve exact or approximate alignment, proving optimality as the number of requested outputs grows. Experiments on text-to-image and geocoded persona generation demonstrate that the proposed post-processing methods improve statistical attribute alignment beyond prompting alone.
arXiv:2607. 06603v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: The notion of algorithmic fairness has been actively explored from various aspects of fairness, such as counterfactual fairness (CF) and group fairness (GF).