Hugging Face Trending Papers

RecRSI: Mechanism-Guided Discovery of Recommendation Algorithms

arXiv Machine Learning
Jul 14

RecRec: Recursive Refinement for Sequential Recommendation

arXiv:2607. 10541v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Sequential recommender systems typically infer user preferences through single-pass encoding of interaction histories without iterative refinement, relying on increasingly deep architectures to capture complex patterns.

By Pervez Shaik, Prosenjit Biswas, Abhinav Thorat, Ravi Kolla, Niranjan Pedanekar
arXiv Computation and Language
Sep 11

Auto-RecSys: Harnessing Autonomous Research Agents for Industry-Scale Recommender System

Auto-RecSys is an autonomous research system designed to scale long-horizon experimentation for industry‑scale recommendation models. It tackles long feedback loops and system complexity by enabling distributed asynchronous execution, centralized cross‑server memory, and a cognitive‑procedural separation that combines natural‑language skill files with deterministic scripts. The system incorporates a dual‑loop self‑evolving architecture—Execution Evolution and Idea Evolution loops—to refine operational playbooks and guide future experiments, thereby reducing human effort per cycle and improving reliability as playbooks mature.

By Ming Li, Dai Li, Xuying Ning, Bo Sun, Rui Li, Yi Zhang, Silvia Gong, Xuan Cao, Rui Li, Cornelia Carapcea, Qunshu Zhang, Zhigang Wang, Yinglong Xia, Andy Wang
Hugging Face Trending Papers
Sep 24

Advancing Model Research in AgentX: Long-Horizon Autonomy for Industrial Recommender Systems

Advancing Model Research in AgentX: Long-Horizon Autonomy for Industrial Recommender Systems introduces AgentX-Model, a dual-agent framework that links proposal development with model experimentation in business-defined sandboxes. The Research Agent drafts proposals from literature and findings, while the Model Agent runs multi‑round experiments, returning code, metrics, and open questions. The framework cycles through Reproduce, Follow‑up, Composition, and Diagnose actions, achieving high AUC gains and significant business metric improvements in online A/B tests.

arXiv AI
Sep 21

AutoRecLab: Describe the Experiment, Get the Code!

AutoRecLab is a Python-based autonomous laboratory for recommender‑system research that transforms natural‑language prompts into executable experiments. It automatically derives experiment requirements, builds and validates prototypes, and iteratively expands them into full studies using retrieval‑augmented generation, static type verification, and execution‑steered tree search. In a demonstration, AutoRecLab autonomously conducted an explicit‑to‑implicit feedback conversion study, achieving 8 of 9 successful runs at an average cost of about $1 per run with GPT‑5.4‑mini.

By Moritz Baumgart, Philipp Meister, Justus Krell, Michael Schmidt, Bela Gipp, Joeran Beel
arXiv AI
Oct 28

Counterfactual Profile Perturbations for Recommendation Explanations: A Reproducibility Study

This reproducibility study investigates the counterfactual explanation method Learning to eXplain Recommendations (LXR) by extending its application beyond the top‑ranked item to other recommended items. The authors compare LXR against alternative baselines such as item popularity and latent factor similarity, noting that these baselines perform surprisingly well on certain tasks. They also analyze how item popularity affects explanation quality, finding that LXR produces shorter perturbations for less popular items, and conduct a brute‑force search to estimate a lower bound on optimal perturbation size.

By Meysam Varasteh, Elizabeth McKinnie, Robin Burke
arXiv AI
Sep 2

RPCBench: A Benchmark for Proactive Premise Critique in LLM-based Recommendation

RPCBench is a new benchmark designed to evaluate large language models’ ability to critique recommendation requests by detecting, diagnosing, and handling flawed premises. It includes evidence‑grounded test instances across five recommendation domains and ten types of premise failures, and introduces a fine‑grained evaluation framework covering detection, error localization, handling strategy, and evidence faithfulness. Experiments with 11 LLMs reveal that proactive detection is the main bottleneck, with models struggling most on underspecified‑premise errors and showing that optimal critique quality occurs at intermediate reasoning lengths.

By Zhongru Chen, Yuan Wu, Yi Chang
arXiv AI
Oct 31

Statistical Detection of Positional Bias in LLM-Based Recommender Systems: Methodologies and Empirical Evidence

The paper investigates positional bias in large language model (LLM)–based recommender systems that use retrieval‑augmented generation (RAG). It introduces two statistical detection methods—POB‑ICM and POB‑UNBP—to test whether the recommended item depends on the order of candidates in the prompt. Experiments on a product‑recommendation testbed with 40,000 instances show that all evaluated state‑of‑the‑art models exhibit significant positional bias, quantified by new metrics such as permutation sensitivity and strong positional bias, and that this bias is structural and model‑dependent rather than an artifact of decoding or candidate‑set size.

By Carlos Pel\'aez-Gonz\'alez, Francisco Herrera, Andr\'es Herrera-Poyatos