arXiv:2606. 00539v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Training stability is a key bottleneck in low-precision language model training: efficient low-cost paths can still produce short-lived numerical risks at a small set of operators.
By Boao Kong, Weichen Jia, Engao Zhang, Guohong Li, Yonghan Dong, Yao Wang, Yaoyuan Wang, Yunke Peng, Kun Yuan
arXiv:2606. 27694v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Randomized Smoothing (RS) provides rigorous robustness guarantees for neural networks without architectural constraints, yet its adoption is limited by extreme computational costs.
By Andrew C. Cullen, Paul Montague, Benjamin I. P. Rubinstein
arXiv:2606. 10487v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Deploying large language models in user-facing systems requires efficient output safety filtering.
By Huizhen Shu, Xuying Li, Piao Xue
arXiv:2502. 17055v5 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Training instability in modern deep learning systems is frequently triggered by rare but extreme gradient-norm spikes, which can induce oversized parameter updates, corrupt optimizer state, and lead to slow recovery or divergence.
By Tianjin Huang, Zhangyang Wang, Haotian Hu, Zhenyu Zhang, Gaojie Jin, Xiang Li, Li Shen, Jiaxing Shang, Tianlong Chen, Ke Li, Lu Liu, Qingsong Wen, Shiwei Liu
arXiv:2607. 11475v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Safety alignment in large language models can be fragile under fine-tuning, as even benign task adaptation may increase harmful compliance.
By Aznaur Aliev, Carlos Hinojosa, Abdelrahman Eldesokey, Bang An, Bernard Ghanem, Yibo Yang
Safety alignment in large language models can be fragile under fine-tuning, as even benign task adaptation may increase harmful compliance. Existing defenses mainly follow two directions: they either intervene during or after fine-tuning through retraining or weight modification, which can be costly and may hurt task performance, or they use model-agnostic safety classifiers, which may miss failures specific to a given fine-tuned checkpoint.
arXiv:2606. 00400v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Continual instruction tuning updates a language model through a sequence of new domains, yet each update can progressively erode previously learned capabilities and alignment behavior.
By Ibne Farabi Shihab, Fariya Afrin, Anuj Sharma
arXiv:2606. 25151v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Physics-informed neural networks (PINNs) embed governing equations in their loss function, enabling mesh-free solutions to partial differential equations.
By David McShannon, Nicholas Dietrich
arXiv:2606. 08452v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: In many real-world settings, data streams are nonstationary and arrive sequentially, requiring learning systems to adapt continuously without retraining from scratch.
By Nazreen Shah, Govinda Arya, Bharath B. N., Ranjitha Prasad
arXiv:2408. 09112v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Reinforcement learning policies parametrized by deep neural networks have achieved strong performance for continuous control, yet even small input perturbations may lead to unpredictable behavior.
By Manuel Wendl, Lukas Koller, Tobias Ladner, Matthias Althoff
arXiv:2406. 05670v3 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Modern machine learning pipelines leverage large amounts of public data, making it infeasible to guarantee data quality and leaving models open to poisoning and backdoor attacks.
By Philip Sosnin, Mark N. M\"uller, Maximilian Baader, Calvin Tsay, Matthew Wicker
arXiv:2504. 01219v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Neural networks are notorious for forgetting old skills when taught new ones - a problem known as catastrophic forgetting.
By Grzegorz Rype\'s\'c