arXiv Computation and Language

Detecting Spin in Clinical Trials with Large Language Models

The paper presents a method for detecting spin in clinical trials by automatically identifying outcome switching using large language models (LLMs). The authors trained on 300 pairs of outcomes labeled for semantic similarity, then evaluated baseline text similarity models and open-source LLMs, applying prompt engineering, token‑probability classification, and majority voting. On a test set of 2,496 examples, the LLM‑based approach achieved an F1 score of 0.78 and accuracy of 0.90, surpassing baseline models but falling short of fine‑tuned BERT, and also produced natural‑language explanations that were manually evaluated for quality.

arXiv Computation and Language
Aug 27

Retrieval-Augmented Agentic Rubric Generation for Reliable Medical Response Evaluation

The paper introduces a retrieval‑augmented multi‑agent framework that automatically generates instance‑specific evaluation rubrics for medical language models. By retrieving authoritative medical evidence, decomposing it into atomic facts, and combining these with user interaction constraints, the system produces fine‑grained criteria that outperform GPT‑4o on HealthBench and LLMEval‑Med. The generated rubrics also guide response refinement, improving medical LLM output quality by 9.2%.

By Yinzhu Chen, Abdine Maiga, Hossein A. Rahmani, Emine Yilmaz
arXiv AI
Sep 15

A primer on evaluation methods for large language models in healthcare

arXiv:2609.14819v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Large language models (LLMs) have a growing range of applications in medicine, and their evaluation is critical for ensuring they provide benefit and...

By Suzannah E McKinney, Phuc Vu, Samuel A Justice, Christopher Humphries, Alyssa Pradhan, Timothy J Keyes, Bernardo C Bizzo, Keith J Dreyer, Sarah F Mercaldo, James M Hillis
arXiv AI
Oct 1

Defining and Categorising Human-AI Interactions in Clinical Trials: A Multidimensional Human-AI Classification Approach

The paper introduces a multidimensional framework for classifying human‑AI interactions (HAIIs) in clinical trials, categorising interactions by AI tasks, human‑AI relationships, interaction configurations, and interacting human groups. It evaluates the framework by applying it to 15 trials, with categorisation performed by both human reviewers and large language model classifiers. The study demonstrates that LLMs can assist in categorisation while highlighting the continued need for human judgment when trial records are incomplete or ambiguous.

By Sandra Woolley, Tim Collins, Khalid Khattak, Illia Chernomorets, Ariane Arevalo, Chris Richardson
arXiv Computation and Language
Oct 22

Exploring Post-Training Alignment of Small Language Models for Biomedical Data-to-Text Generation: A Case Study of Medication Leaflet

The study investigates how post‑training alignment techniques affect small language models (SLMs) for generating medication leaflets from structured biomedical data. Four alignment methods—supervised fine‑tuning (SFT), direct preference optimization (DPO), odds ratio preference optimization (ORPO), and group relative policy optimization (GRPO)—are evaluated using Qwen‑2.5 models, with a new FDALeaflets dataset derived from OpenFDA drug labels for zero‑shot cross‑regulatory testing. Results show that aligned SLMs can outperform GPT‑5 on reference‑based metrics, while ORPO and GRPO achieve the highest semantic textual similarity scores in‑domain and on FDALeaflets, respectively, highlighting the importance of alignment for semantic fidelity and generalization.

By Xi Yang, Guodong Liu, Chuqin Li, Fan Wu, Ergin Soysal, Min Jiang, Xing He, Jiang Bian, Yi Guo, Shams Zaman, Thomas Fuchs, Yonghui Wu
Hugging Face Trending Papers
Aug 17

Toward Better Assessment of LLMs' Performance in Clinical Error Detection

Automated detection of errors in clinical documentation is a promising application of large language models (LLMs), yet decisions to deploy such models rest on benchmarks that evaluate each clinical note in isolation. Error-detection benchmarks are typically constructed by injecting errors into notes, such that each erroneous note has a natural counterpart.

arXiv AI
Jun 2

Med-V1: Small Language Models for Zero-shot and Scalable Biomedical Evidence Attribution

arXiv:2603. 05308v3 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Assessing whether an article supports an assertion is essential for hallucination detection and claim verification.

By Qiao Jin, Yin Fang, Lauren He, Yifan Yang, Guangzhi Xiong, Zhizheng Wang, Nicholas Wan, Joey Chan, Donald C. Comeau, Robert Leaman, Charalampos S. Floudas, Aidong Zhang, Michael F. Chiang, Yifan Peng, Zhiyong Lu