arXiv AI

FuzzInsight: Navigating the Efficiency-Effectiveness Trade-off in Coverage-Guided DNN Fuzzing

arXiv Machine Learning
4d ago

Stateful Testing for Deep Learning Compilers

The paper introduces Rondo, a stateful testing framework for deep‑learning compilers that models each test as a model plus an invocation sequence. Rondo mutates sequences using a Markov chain Monte Carlo sampler guided by compilation behavior, and employs a three‑way differential oracle to detect bugs that arise only when compiler state is retained. Evaluated on four major frameworks and 24 model architectures, Rondo uncovered 117 bugs—35 of which were stateful—leading to 39 bug reports, 35 confirmed by developers, and 18 fixes, while achieving high coverage and precision.

By Jiatao Ge, Ruixiang Qian, Yibo Hu, Yanzhou Mu, Yinglong Zou, Jiawei Liu, Zhenyu Chen, Chunrong Fang
arXiv Machine Learning
Aug 27

FuzzingBrain-Bench V1: Evaluating Open-Ended Bug Discovery by LLMs

FuzzingBrain‑Bench V1 is a new benchmark that tests large language models (LLMs) on their ability to discover software bugs in open‑source projects. Unlike prior benchmarks that focus on a single target vulnerability, this benchmark gives models a Docker‑based harness and asks them to generate inputs that trigger as many distinct crashes as possible. The first version contains 77 challenges from 43 projects (36 C, 32 C++, 9 Java/JVM) and evaluates Claude Haiku 4.5, Claude Sonnet 4.6, and Claude Opus 4.8, with Claude Opus 4.8 achieving the highest score by triggering crashes in 60 of 77 challenges.

By Ze Sheng, Aleksandar Kezic, Zhicheng Chen, Jeff Huang
Hugging Face Trending Papers
Jul 13

DeepBias: Adaptive In-depth Probing of Social Biases in LVLMs

While Large Vision-Language Models (LVLMs) demonstrate remarkable capabilities, they remain highly susceptible to embedded social biases. Existing bias evaluation protocols predominantly rely on static datasets, which provide only a superficial assessment, as their fixed test cases cannot adaptively evolve to measure the true depth and limits of model vulnerabilities.

arXiv AI
5d ago

SWEPatchTest: Evaluating Software Tests Beyond Reproduction

SWEPatchTest is a benchmark that evaluates software tests by measuring their ability to reproduce issues, accept correct patches, and reject incorrect ones across 619 tasks and 82,579 candidate patches. It introduces the Joint Validation Rate metric, revealing that even the best configurations only achieve 9.21% success when all three criteria are met. Using these validation scores to select demonstrations for supervised fine‑tuning can roughly triple the Joint Validation Rate and enhance downstream repair performance on multiple SWE‑bench datasets.

By Hua Lu, Pengcheng Wang, Han Li, Zichen Tian, Yanyu Chen, Huang He, Bingjin Chen