arXiv:2604. 24012v3 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Federated learning enables a population of clients to collaboratively train machine learning models without exchanging their raw data, but standard algorithms such as FedAvg suffer from slow convergence and high communication and memory costs in heterogeneous, resource-constrained environments.
By Yutong He, Zhengyang Huang, Jiahe Geng, Kun Yuan
The paper proposes a new federated learning approach called FedALS that reduces communication costs by varying aggregation frequencies across model layers. It derives tighter generalization bounds for one‑round and multi‑round federated learning, linking these bounds to local updates and data heterogeneity. Based on representation‑learning insights, the authors argue that infrequent aggregation of early layers and more frequent aggregation of final layers yields more generalizable models, especially in non‑iid settings, and demonstrate the method’s effectiveness experimentally.
By Peyman Gholami, Hulya Seferoglu
arXiv:2609.39074v1 Announce Type: cross
Abstract: Federated learning (FL) on memory-constrained edge devices faces a dilemma: first-order (FO) optimization (i.e., backpropagation) demands substantial...
By Qiyuan Chen, Xian Wu, Yanan Ma, Xianhao Chen
arXiv:2502. 10239v3 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Federated Learning (FL) is a promising paradigm for finetuning Large Language Models (LLMs) across distributed data sources while preserving data privacy.
By Mohamed Aboelenien Ahmed, Kilian Pfeiffer, Ramin Khalili, Heba Khdr, J\"org Henkel
arXiv:2511. 19959v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Federated learning (FL) has been extensively studied as a privacy-preserving training paradigm.
By Yujia Wang, Yuanpu Cao, Jinghui Chen
arXiv:2606. 28835v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Federated Learning (FL) emerged as a promising distributed machine learning paradigm.
By Wenhao Yuan, Chenchen Lin, Jian Chen, Jinfeng Xu, Zewei Liu, Edith Cheuk Han Ngai
\textit{Split Federated Learning} (SFL) enables distributed model training by splitting networks between the server and clients. However, under client heterogeneity, the conventional static split stra...
arXiv:2608. 15639v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: \textit{Split Federated Learning} (SFL) enables distributed model training by splitting networks between the server and clients.
By Wenhao Yuan, Chenchen Lin, Wenhao Hu, Jian Chen, Jinfeng Xu, Shujie Li, Edith Cheuk Han Ngai
arXiv:2311.03154v3 Announce Type: replace
Abstract: There are two categories of methods in Federated Learning (FL) for joint training across multiple clients: (i) parallel FL (PFL), where clients tra...
By Yipeng Li, Xinchen Lyu
arXiv:2602. 04879v3 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Reinforcement learning (RL) has become a cornerstone for fine-tuning Large Language Models (LLMs), with Proximal Policy Optimization (PPO) serving as the de facto standard algorithm.
By Penghui Qi, Xiangxin Zhou, Zichen Liu, Tianyu Pang, Chao Du, Min Lin, Wee Sun Lee
arXiv:2607. 04170v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Federated Learning (FL) enables decentralized training without data sharing, but suffers from statistical heterogeneity across clients, leading to client drift, poor generalization, and sharp minima compared to centralized training.
By Liyang Yuan, Yibo Yang, Dandan Guo
The paper introduces Batched SGD, a variant that groups online samples into epochs and performs a single update per epoch using a low‑variance gradient estimate. This batching approach allows a straightforward high‑probability analysis without restrictive assumptions or auxiliary sequences, yielding near‑optimal rates for both strongly convex and non‑convex objectives under standard smoothness and sub‑Gaussian noise conditions. The authors also extend the method to federated learning, providing the first high‑probability guarantees with logarithmic communication complexity, linear speedup in the number of agents, and robustness to data heterogeneity.
By Feng Zhu, Robert W. Heath Jr., Aritra Mitra