Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) systems use the question-answering capabilities of Large Language Models (LLMs) to access information outside their parameters. We evaluate if cluster-based semantic chunking improves retrieval and answer quality compared to fixed-size and recursive chunking evaluating on long, structured academic theses using the Retrieval Augmented Generation Assessment (RAGAs) framework.
arXiv:2607. 24767v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) systems have emerged as a powerful process for allowing large language models (LLMs) to retrieve relevant information to use as source material during text generation.
By German Garrido-Lestache Belinchon, Hugo Garrido-Lestache Belinchon
arXiv:2402. 01767v3 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) has rapidly advanced the language model field, particularly in question-answering (QA) systems.
By Xinyue Chen, Pengyu Gao, Jiangjiang Song, Xiaoyang Tan
The paper introduces EAR, an Entity‑Aware Partitioning approach that improves retrieval‑augmented generation for multiple‑choice question answering by extracting normalized surface anchors from questions, answers, and the corpus. EAR retrieves local windows around matching anchors and can attach a larger parent passage via an extractive summary, reducing retrieved words by 37.5‑40.2% compared to fixed‑size chunks. Experiments on a cleaned MMLU‑style subset with Mistral, Gemma, and DeepSeek show modest accuracy changes, none statistically significant, highlighting EAR’s methodological contribution of compact, inspectable retrieval units.
By Cenab Batu Bora, Oylum Alatl{\i}, Sebnem Bora, Oguz Dikenelli
arXiv:2606. 28337v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) systems are often evaluated using final answer accuracy, even though their failures can originate from preprocessing, retrieval, context packing, or generation.
By Bharath Simha Reddy Muthyam
arXiv:2606. 14817v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: This work presents the design, implementation, and evaluation of a system for generating personalized reading content using Large Language Models (LLMs) combined with Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG).
By Sooyeon Kim, Piotr S. Maci\k{a}g
The study investigates how document segmentation (chunking) and embedding choices influence Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) performance for Turkish, a morphologically rich language. Using a fully crossed experimental design, the authors compare three chunking strategies (fixed-length, semantic, and layout-aware Docling), five embedding models, and two large language model generators across three documents with different layouts, generating 9,000 graded question-answer evaluations. Key findings include that layout-aware chunking reduces the impact of embedding choice, the top embedding models perform similarly, faster generators are not more accurate, and the optimal configuration varies with content type, achieving a best overall accuracy of 87.0%.
By Mustafa Serta\c{c} T\"urkel, Fatma Nur Korkmaz, Ahmet Tu\u{g}rul Bayrak
arXiv:2608.21252v1 Announce Type: cross
Abstract: Question answering (QA) over long, connected documents remains challenging because relevant evidence may span multiple entities and their relationshi...
By Xuanyu Meng, Jiashuo Sun, Jash Rajesh Parekh, Jiawei Han
arXiv:2608. 03860v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: We introduce SciRet, a compute-aware empirical study of retrieval-augmented generation for scientific question answering over CORD-19.
By Kaysarul Anas Apurba, Md. Hasibul Hasan, Rofiqul Alam Shehab, Asab Azad
While large language models have been dominating the research landscape recently, small language models remain highly relevant across various domains; yet, they receive far less attention. In this study, we investigate how smaller language models perform during the generation stage within a Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) system.
arXiv:2509. 16780v3 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Large language models (LLMs) show promise as educational aids but often lack alignment with specific course materials.
By Eason Chen, Chuangji Li, Eric Li, Zimo Xiao, Jionghao Lin, Kenneth R. Koedinger
arXiv:2607. 23006v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Scientific question answering requires a retrieval system to solve two distinct problems: identifying which papers are relevant and locating the supporting evidence within those papers.
By Xinyan Zhong, Yuwei Shi, Yuqi Wei, Chen Shen, Tianhang Zhou, Zhenghao Wu