The paper introduces a dual‑process architecture for nonlinear motion planning that blends fast, learning‑based intuition (System‑1) with slow, robust symbolic reasoning (System‑2). A metacognitive controller decides when to use each component, aiming to balance speed, precision, and adaptability. Experiments on diverse benchmark environments show consistent improvements in planning efficiency, accuracy, and generalization, highlighting the benefits of integrating learning with structured reasoning.
By Jiayi Yan, Francesco Fabiano, Alessandro Abate
arXiv:2608.29988v1 Announce Type: new
Abstract: Large language models (LLMs) achieve strong reasoning performance, which depends critically on inference-time decisions. Yet these decisions are common...
By Hanjun Luo, Qiushi Liu, Jingya Zhang, Haihong Pang, Jiaheng Wen, Yifei Ma, Yu Yao, Chengxi Zhang, Hanrong Zhang, Yankai Chen, Hanan Salam
arXiv:2608. 06434v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Embodied intelligence demands both long-horizon reasoning and real-time closed-loop responsiveness.
By Yuewei Sun, Lang Qin, Zechuan Tian, Jingwen Li, Guiqin Wang, Shengzeng Huo, Wenxin Ren, Tao Fang, Xiaochen Zhang, Guanqing Deng, Xiang Wang, Xiaowen Dong, Qinghai Guo, Yuxin Ma
arXiv:2606. 16480v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Robots deployed in the real world must plan motions across diverse scenarios without per-scenario retuning.
By Youngjae Min, Jovin D'sa, Faizan M. Tariq, David Isele, Navid Azizan, Sangjae Bae
arXiv:2607. 16421v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: It has long been recognized that humans have the ability to switch between fast, reactive decision-making and slower, deliberative planning.
By Adam Labiosa, Josiah P. Hanna
arXiv:2608. 12854v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Autonomous driving requires planning under both semantic constraints and predictive dynamics.
By Bing Zhan, Shuyao Shang, Jiahao Gu, Shuo Lu, Yuan Xu, Zhao Wang, Yida Wang, Xueyang Zhang, Kun Zhan, Lue Fan, Zhaoxiang Zhang
arXiv:2605. 04568v3 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: State-of-the-art model-based Reinforcement Learning (RL) approaches either use gradient-free, population-based methods for planning, learned policy networks, or a combination of policy networks and planning.
By Jonathan Spieler, Sven Behnke
Autonomous driving requires planning under both semantic constraints and predictive dynamics. Existing end-to-end driving approaches, however, typically emphasize only one side of this requirement: Vision-Language-Action (VLA) models exploit VLM priors for semantic reasoning, while World Action Models (WAMs) provide future-aware prediction through generative world modeling.
arXiv:2606. 07974v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: A learned world model provides a powerful physical intuition for evaluating future states.
By Yuhai Wang, Jiawei Xia, Rongxuan Zhou, Xiao Hu, Yongliang Shi, Jing Du, Yang Ye
arXiv:2606.23079v2 Announce Type: replace-cross
Abstract: Neural world models coupled with model predictive control (MPC) replan at every environment step to bound accumulated prediction error, but t...
By Yutian Cheng, Xiaojian Ma, Xianhao Wang, Min Yang, Rongpeng Su, Hangxin Liu, Xi Chen, Shuai Li, Qing Li
arXiv:2607. 04179v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: End-to-end Vision-Language Models (VLMs) show immense potential in autonomous driving.
By Zhaohong Liu, Hao Ye, Xianlin Zhang, Mengshi Qi
arXiv:2606.27504v2 Announce Type: replace
Abstract: World Action Models (WAMs) unify future environment prediction with action generation for autonomous driving, yet existing approaches optimize only...
By Tianze Xia, Lijun Zhou, Kaixin Xiong, Jingfeng Yao, Zhenxin Zhu, Haiyang Sun, Bing Wang, Guang Chen, Wenyu Liu, Hangjun Ye, Xinggang Wang