arXiv:2606. 29579v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Spatial reasoning remains a persistent challenge for many vision language models (VLMs), and improving it typically requires fine-tuning with substantial additional parameters.
By Rahul Chowdhury, Timothy A Rupprecht, Xuan Shen, Pu Zhao, Yanzhi Wang
arXiv:2510.13394v4 Announce Type: replace
Abstract: Spatial reasoning ability is crucial for Vision Language Models (VLMs) to support real-world applications in diverse domains including robotics, au...
By Xinmiao Huang, Qisong He, Zhenglin Huang, Boxuan Wang, Zhuoyun Li, Guangliang Cheng, Yi Dong, Xiaowei Huang
MV-STRIDE is a Multi‑View hierarchical Spatial Reasoning dataset that models dependencies among perception, scene understanding, and contextual reasoning to support 3D spatial cognition. It introduces a QA generation pipeline that enforces cross‑view constraints, producing multi‑level reasoning tasks with chain‑of‑thought supervision. Experiments show that training on MV‑STRIDE yields state‑of‑the‑art performance on multi‑view spatial benchmarks, enabling MLLMs to reason robustly across diverse viewpoints.
By Jin Xu, Xiaojian Huang, Zhuodong Luo, Zhihong Zhang, Xin Liu, Jiansheng Wei, Xinzhi Wang, Jie Zhao, Xuejin Chen
arXiv:2610.01999v1 Announce Type: new
Abstract: Spatial reasoning benchmarks evaluate vision-language models across diverse tasks, but task-level scores do not reveal which underlying capabilities ac...
By Pengzhan Sun, Junbin Xiao, Ramanathan Rajaraman, Shiu-hong Kao, Angela Yao
Spatial-OPSD is a label‑free self‑improvement framework for vision‑language models that leverages spatial priors such as depth, 3D relations, and camera geometry to provide dense token‑level supervision. During training, a privileged teacher uses these priors while the student learns from only the original visual‑language input, and a recursive round‑wise scheme allows repeated self‑improvement without moving the teacher. Across four VLM families, one round of Spatial‑OPSD improves the five‑benchmark average, and three rounds push a strong spatially specialized model to the open‑source frontier, achieving the highest average among open models and best results on three of five spatial reasoning benchmarks.
By Zhenyu Liu, Zhangquan Chen, Keyi Chen, Mingze Sun, Xiang An, Haodong Jing, Ruqi Huang
arXiv:2606. 03988v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Vision language models (VLMs) excel at many tasks but still struggle with spatial reasoning when critical information is not directly observable.
By Mahtab Bigverdi, Lindsey Li, Weikai Huang, Yiming Liu, Jaemin Cho, Jieyu Zhang, Tuhin Kundu, Chris Dangjoo Kim, Zelun Luo, Linda Shapiro, Ranjay Krishna
arXiv:2609.38716v1 Announce Type: cross
Abstract: Large Vision-Language Models (LVLMs) have made remarkable progress across visual perception tasks, yet spatial reasoning remains a persistent weaknes...
By Rafi Ibn Sultan, Xiangyu Zhou, Md. Sajid Alam Chowdhury, Chengyin Li, Prashant Khanduri, Marco Brocanelli, Dongxiao Zhu
arXiv:2606.22694v2 Announce Type: replace
Abstract: Vision-Language Models (VLMs) remain unreliable when spatial reasoning requires composing relations whose meanings depend on frames of reference. E...
By Danial Kamali, Tanawan Premsri, Shreya Rajpal, Amir Zadeh, Chuan Li, Parisa Kordjamshidi
MultihopSpatial is a new benchmark for Vision‑Language Models that focuses on multi‑hop, compositional spatial reasoning with queries ranging from 1 to 3 hops across varied spatial perspectives. It introduces the Acc@50IoU metric, which jointly evaluates answer selection and precise bounding‑box prediction, and provides a large‑scale training corpus, MultihopSpatial‑Train, to improve spatial intelligence. Evaluation of 37 state‑of‑the‑art VLMs shows that compositional spatial reasoning remains a significant challenge, and reinforcement learning fine‑tuning on the corpus boosts both intrinsic spatial reasoning and downstream embodied manipulation performance.
By Youngwan Lee, Soojin Jang, Yoorhim Cho, Seunghwan Lee, Yong-Ju Lee, Sung Ju Hwang
arXiv:2607. 17657v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Multimodal large language models (MLLMs) still struggle with spatial reasoning that requires perspective transformation.
By Wenxiao Fan, Hang Yin, Kan Li
arXiv:2608. 01899v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Vision-Language Models (VLMs) perform well on commonsense reasoning tasks but struggle with visual spatial reasoning.
By Jing Wu, Jianhua Wu, Jiayi Guan, Jiahong Chen, Jinghui Lu, Hangjun Ye, Bingzhao Gao, Long Chen
Soft Spatial Reasoning introduces a post‑training framework for Large Vision‑Language Models that replaces hard, token‑by‑token chain‑of‑thought reasoning with a soft, continuous state formed by mixing token embeddings at each intermediate step. The method employs AdaptSoft, a controller that adjusts the degree of softness based on hidden states and predictive uncertainty, guided by a gradient‑alignment learning objective that requires no intermediate supervision. Experiments on diverse spatial benchmarks show that this approach outperforms both hard and fixed‑soft chain‑of‑thought baselines and several existing LVLMs.
By Rafi Ibn Sultan, Md. Sajid Alam Chowdhury, Saleh Zare Zade, Chengyin Li, Prashant Khanduri, Marco Brocanelli, Dongxiao Zhu