The paper introduces LOCOMO-CONV, a conversational memory benchmark that expands on the existing LoCoMo dataset with four query styles—dialog, implicit, counterfactual, and composed—designed to evaluate memory systems in realistic conversational settings. Experiments across five memory systems reveal that conversational framing uncovers significant retrieval gaps missed by traditional QA benchmarks, particularly for implicit and composed queries, and that strong retrieval does not necessarily translate into higher response quality. The study also highlights silent grounding in implicit queries, where memory enhances contextual grounding without explicitly presenting the gold fact, suggesting a need for reasoning-based memory elaboration.
By Wen-Yu Chang, Yun-Nung Chen
arXiv:2608.22310v1 Announce Type: new
Abstract: Long-term memory is crucial for personalized responses and long-horizon agent interactions. Existing methods often rely on LLMs to compress or rewrite...
By Yuanhua Lin, Yile Li, Zhiyuan Zhao, Jing Shang, Jian Sun
JustMem is a new memory system for long‑term conversational AI that stores conversation history as compact atomic memories and adapts its access strategy to each query. It introduces two dimensions of memory access—discovery breadth and reading fidelity—implemented through LOOKUP for local evidence, COMPOSE for distributed evidence, and REPLAY for fidelity‑sensitive evidence. Experiments on LoCoMo and LongMemEval‑S show that JustMem outperforms competing memory systems in accuracy and recall while using fewer generative‑model tokens for memory construction and inference.
By Guanhua Chen, Yanting Wang, Wenjing Zhi, Lei Sha
arXiv:2609.07093v2 Announce Type: replace
Abstract: Retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) enables large language models (LLMs) to answer questions by accessing external knowledge and has been widely a...
By Yifan Wang, Xinkui Lin, Yongxiu Xu, Shen Gao, Ruochen Yang, Kun Huang, Yubin Wang, Jie Wu, Wei Liu, Jian Luan, Hongbo Xu, Shuo Shang
DiaLong is a new long‑context dialogue benchmark that tests transformer‑based Large Language Models’ ability to retain and recall memories. The dataset contains 100 human‑created conversations, expanded with LLMs to exceed lengths of existing datasets, and includes a fact‑recall task where models must classify 40 candidate facts as true or false. Experiments show current LLMs and memory‑enhancement methods still struggle, indicating a need for improved memory performance in extended conversations.
By Owen Bianchi, Samer Aslan, Ryunosuke Saito
The paper introduces QGMem, a memory framework for conversational agents that organizes dialogue history into event-indexed atomic units and consolidates related units into dynamic memory traces. When a query is posed, QGMem retrieves complementary candidate memories, reranks them to form a compact working memory, and represents this working memory as a local graph to expose relational dependencies. Experiments on six benchmarks demonstrate consistent improvements in retrieval, multi‑hop evidence composition, conflict resolution, and ultra‑long dialogue reasoning while keeping context size and inference cost moderate.
By Yichen Liu, Chunfeng Yuan, Haowei Liu, Wenjuan Li, Zefeng Lin, Bing Li, Xu Chen, Weiming Hu
UTILMEM is a new diagnostic benchmark that tests how conversational agents use long‑term memory, focusing on reasoning over dense histories, spotting implicitly relevant memories, synthesizing distributed evidence, and resisting interference from similar distractors. It contains 1,717 instances across five domains and evaluates a range of retrieval‑based and memory‑augmented systems. The study shows that strong performance on traditional factual recall does not guarantee effective memory utilization, highlighting a gap between retrieving information and integrating it into coherent, task‑oriented outputs.
By Peijun Qing, Fobo Shi, Soroush Vosoughi
PRAGMA is a benchmark designed to evaluate personalized guidance in long‑term conversations. It includes curated longitudinal conversation histories, evidence annotations, and guidance scenarios that reflect evolving user contexts and incorrect assumptions. Experiments show that current retrieval, memory, and long‑context models struggle to recover relevant conversational evidence and to use it effectively for personalized guidance.
By Hyojeong Yu, Hyukhun Koh, Minsung Kim, Yunah Jang, Kyomin Jung
APDMem is a hierarchical long‑term memory system for personalized LLM assistants that uses progressive disclosure to retrieve conversation history. It organizes memory into four layers—thematic summaries, personalized key facts, turn‑level evidence notes, and raw messages—and a controller reads from the top layer, drilling down only when necessary. This approach balances cost and fidelity, allowing simple queries to finish early while deeper inspection is triggered for complex or exact‑evidence requests, and a note synthesizer structures retrieved evidence before answer generation. Experiments on LongMemEval show APDMem performs strongly while accessing only 8% of the total conversations.
By Chin-Lun Fu, Anagha Kulkarni, Hong Ni, Behrouz Madahian
arXiv:2608. 03463v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Long-term memory is essential for LLM-based agents to sustain interactions and reliably leverage distant history.
By Yuxin Liao, Le Wu, Min Hou, Hao Liu, Han Wu, Zishu Wang
Large language model agents have shown strong capabilities in generating coherent and contextually appropriate responses, yet robust long-horizon dialogue remains limited by the lack of external memory that is traceable, updatable, and diagnostically transparent. Existing memory-augmented agents often store memories as isolated records or overwritable states, making it difficult to preserve how information originates, evolves, conflicts, or becomes obsolete over time.
arXiv:2606. 01223v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Despite substantial progress in long-context modeling, existing benchmarks remain confined to factual memory for explicit recall, failing to measure the reflective memory required to synthesize fragmented, multimodal cues into high-level interpretations.
By Jingjie Lin, Bingbing Wang, Zihan Wang, Zhengda Jin, Weiming Qiao, Jing Li, Ruifeng Xu