arXiv:2602. 00884v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Neural operators have shown promise in learning solution maps of partial differential equations (PDEs), but they often struggle to generalize when test inputs lie outside the training distribution, such as novel initial conditions, unseen PDE coefficients or unseen physics.
By Louis Serrano, Jiequn Han, Edouard Oyallon, Shirley Ho, Rudy Morel
arXiv:2608.24049v1 Announce Type: new
Abstract: Neural operators provide efficient surrogates for spatiotemporal PDE systems, but purely data-driven formulations often accumulate substantial errors d...
By Jihao Zhang, Junyi Guo, Jian-Xun Wang
The paper introduces a method for selecting the best neural‑operator model during deployment without needing high‑fidelity reference solutions. By using a squared Hilbert‑space loss, the authors show that ranking a finite library of models depends only on the low‑dimensional span of candidate differences, enabling simultaneous scoring of all models with a single anchor‑based linearized response of the governing equation. This shared physical diagnostic accurately recovered over 99.6% of pairwise preferences and 99.0% of optimal checkpoints across diverse Fourier and convolutional operator libraries for fluid, reaction‑diffusion, and wave dynamics, and often outperformed the best individual candidates.
By Hanbing Liang, Fujun Liu
arXiv:2606. 06164v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Physics-informed neural operators (PINOs) aim to learn solution operators for partial differential equations by using the governing physics as supervision, rather than relying solely on paired input-output simulation data.
By Nanxi Chen, Chuanjie Cui, Airong Chen, Sifan Wang, Rujin Ma
arXiv:2510. 25306v3 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Partial physical knowledge--governing structures known, constitutive relations or their combinations not--pervades spatiotemporal systems.
By Xizhe Wang, Xiaobin Song, Hongbo Zhao, Qingshan Jia, Qianchuan Zhao, Hao Sun, Benben Jiang
Physics-informed neural operators (PINOs) aim to learn solution operators for partial differential equations by using the governing physics as supervision, rather than relying solely on paired input-output simulation data. By incorporating physical constraints into the training objective, PINOs combine the cross-instance generalization of neural operators with the data efficiency of physics-informed learning.
arXiv:2604. 07366v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Partial differential equations (PDEs) govern nearly every physical process in science and engineering, but solving them at scale remains prohibitively expensive.
By Yilong Dai, Shengyu Chen, Xiaowei Jia, Runlong Yu
arXiv:2606. 16602v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Neural operator models trained on simulation data often lose accuracy when applied to experimental measurements due to the sim-to-real gap.
By Changjian Zhou, Junfeng Fang, Negin Yousefpour, Peng Wu, Bin Yan, Guillermo A Narsilio
arXiv:2602. 09303v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: We propose a physics-informed consistency modeling framework for solving partial differential equations (PDEs) via fast, few-step generative inference.
By Che-Chia Chang, Chen-Yang Dai, Te-Sheng Lin, Ming-Chih Lai, Chieh-Hsin Lai
The paper introduces Neptune, a method that uses independent coordinate neural networks to infer parameter fields in multi-physics PDEs from sparse measurements. Neptune can accurately estimate parameters with nonlinear, spatiotemporal variations, outperforming existing techniques by reducing estimation errors by up to two orders of magnitude and improving dynamic response predictions by a factor of ten. It also demonstrates strong physical extrapolation, enabling reliable predictions beyond the training data.
By Xuyang Li, Mahdi Masmoudi, Rami Gharbi, Nizar Lajnef, Vishnu Naresh Boddeti
arXiv:2602. 12706v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Neural operators have emerged as fast surrogate solvers for parametric partial differential equations (PDEs).
By Heechang Kim, Qianying Cao, Hyomin Shin, Seungchul Lee, George Em Karniadakis, Minseok Choi
The paper introduces PAM-GS, a physics-aware gradient surgery technique for Physics-Informed Neural Networks (PINNs). It addresses the highly imbalanced multi-task optimisation problem in PINNs by adaptively mitigating task interference based on observed gradient conflicts. Experiments on four PDE benchmarks show that PAM-GS achieves competitive solution accuracy while maintaining strong task-balanced performance, outperforming existing methods on most problems.
By Thomas Borsani, Giuseppe Di Fatta