arXiv Computer Vision

Generator-Aligned Reward Modeling with Target-Aware Bounded Optimization for Visual Generation

The paper introduces a post‑training framework for visual generative models that enhances specific attributes while preserving overall quality. It combines Generator‑Aligned Reward Modeling (GARM) to align reward signals with the generator’s distribution and reduce content confounding, with Target‑Aware Bounded Optimization (TABO) that caps reward values using real target examples. The authors also present TA‑GRPO, a flow‑based video optimization variant that further improves attribute enhancement and mitigates unintended attribute leakage.

arXiv Computer Vision
Sep 30

Think Before You Score: Thinking Reward Model for Visual Generation

arXiv:2609.37372v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Visual reward models are essential for evaluating and improving visual generation models, yet existing approaches typically map task conditions and can...

By Xuehai Bai, Zhenchen Tang, Yang Shi, Dianyi Wang, Tengfei Liu, Wanshun Su, Xuanyu Zhu, Ruohui Wang, Haiwen Diao, Haotian Wang, Xiaoling Gu, Yuanxing Zhang
arXiv Computer Vision
Sep 7

Learning to Credit the Right Steps: Objective-aware Process Optimization for Visual Generation

The paper introduces Objective-aware Trajectory Credit Assignment (OTCA), a framework that refines reinforcement learning for diffusion-based visual generation. OTCA decomposes credit across denoising steps and allocates multiple reward signals adaptively, addressing the coarse, uniform reward assignment of existing GRPO pipelines. Experiments demonstrate that OTCA consistently enhances image and video generation quality across various metrics.

By Rui Li, Ke Hao, Yuanzhi Liang, Haibin Huang, Chi Zhang, Yun Gu, Xuelong Li
arXiv Computer Vision
Aug 28

RubricRM: Generative Reward Modeling via Dynamic Rubrics for Image Generation and Editing

RubricRM introduces a pairwise generative reward modeling framework that generates an input‑specific rubric—comprising evaluation dimensions, weights, and scoring criteria—to score candidate images. The method is trained in two stages: supervised fine‑tuning to learn the rubric‑based scoring paradigm and GRPO to refine dimension‑level rewards. Experiments on text‑to‑image generation and instruction‑based image editing benchmarks demonstrate that RubricRM outperforms existing specialized reward models and competes with strong proprietary MLLM judges while using smaller backbones.

By Zijian Kan, Wei Wang, Long Luo, Bing Zhao, Xuan Ren, Weixu Qiao, Wenbo Li, Hu Wei, Lin Qu
arXiv AI
3d ago

EmoReward: Self-Evolving Reward Calibration for Emotional Video Generation RL

EmoReward is a self‑evolving reward calibration framework for emotional video generation using reinforcement learning. It distills reliability from reward traces during training to adaptively weight multiple reward primitives—such as visual quality, motion, and text alignment—based on emotional evidence. The method employs grounding cues, heterogeneous signal primitives, reflective reward gating, and a RewardMemory module to calibrate fusion weights across training runs, demonstrating improvements on HunyuanVideo 1.5 and transferability to SD 3.5 and FLUX.

By Mingzhe Zheng, Yue Wu, Jing Tan, Chang Zou, Dengyang Jiang, Zeyue Tian, Xuanhua He, Ryan Xu, Yunyang Ge, Sihui Ji, Yunlong Lin, Kaihang Pan, Hongru Yan, Sixiang Chen, Dianyi Wang, Julian Zhang, Weijie Kong, Changlin Li, Lanqing Guo, Zhao Zhong, Qifeng Chen, Harry Yang
arXiv AI
Oct 5

Post-Training Frontier Text-to-Image Models by Composing Preference and Rubric Rewards

The paper presents a post‑training approach for text‑to‑image models that combines a preference reward, trained on large human preference data, with rubric‑based rewards that assess prompt faithfulness and other desirable traits. The authors show that a simple reward composition strategy outperforms a naive weighted average, leading to significant Elo gains on the Arena leaderboard for models like Flux2dev and Ideogram‑4. They also release Arena‑T2I‑Training, a 1K subset of data to aid reproducible research in post‑training.

By Yuanhao Ban, I-Hung Hsu, Anastasios Angelopoulos, Wei-Lin Chiang, Ion Stoica, Cho-Jui Hsieh
arXiv Machine Learning
Oct 23

Building Presentation Intelligence for High-Quality Slide Generation

The paper introduces a unified training framework for automatic PowerPoint generation, combining cross‑validated data synthesis, rule‑based teacher enhancement, and a mixed‑teacher supervised fine‑tuning strategy. It further adds a reinforcement learning component with verifiable aesthetic metrics to refine slide visual attributes. Experiments show significant performance gains on PresentBench, outperforming existing models and improving aesthetic quality.

By Yuhang Xie, Cheng Li, Chenliang Li, Mingyu Xu, Mingwei Sun, Suhang Zheng, Ming Yan, Xiaoxiao Xu, Lin Qu
arXiv AI
Oct 15

REEL: Learning to Retrieve, Evaluate, and Evolve Visual Memory for Any Long-Horizon Multi-Shot Video Generation

arXiv:2610.16632v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Memory-based long-video generation aims to combine user control with long-range visual consistency. We organize this process into three functional co...

By Hang Xu, Guohui Zhang, Xiaoxiao Ma, Hu Yu, Jie Huang, Jiayin Xiao, Lin Song, Haoyang Huang, Nan Duan, Feng Zhao
arXiv Machine Learning
Jun 29

Qwen-Image-2.0-RL Technical Report

arXiv:2606. 27608v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: We present Qwen-Image-2.

By Yixian Xu, Kaiyuan Gao, Yuxiang Chen, Yilei Chen, Zecheng Tang, Zihao Liu, Zikai Zhou, Deqing Li, Hao Meng, Kuan Cao, Jiahao Li, Jie Zhang, Liang Peng, Lihan Jiang, Ningyuan Tang, Shengming Yin, Tianhe Wu, Xiaoyue Chen, Yan Shu, Yanran Zhang, Yi Wang, Yu Wu, Yujia Wu, Zekai Zhang, Zhendong Wang, Xiao Xu, Kun Yan, Chenfei Wu
arXiv Machine Learning
Jul 3

Optimizing Visual Generative Models via Distribution-wise Rewards

arXiv:2607. 02291v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Conventional reinforcement learning strategies for visual generation typically employ sample-wise reward functions, yet this practice frequently results in reward hacking that degrades image diversity and introduces visual anomalies.

By Ruihang Li, Mengde Xu, Shuyang Gu, Leigang Qu, Fuli Feng, Han Hu, Wenjie Wang