arXiv Machine Learning

Building Presentation Intelligence for High-Quality Slide Generation

The paper introduces a unified training framework for automatic PowerPoint generation, combining cross‑validated data synthesis, rule‑based teacher enhancement, and a mixed‑teacher supervised fine‑tuning strategy. It further adds a reinforcement learning component with verifiable aesthetic metrics to refine slide visual attributes. Experiments show significant performance gains on PresentBench, outperforming existing models and improving aesthetic quality.

arXiv AI
Jul 1

PPT-Eval: A Benchmark for Computer-Use Agents on PowerPoint Tasks

arXiv:2606. 31154v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Creating and editing slides is a rich, multimodal activity that is ubiquitous in professional and educational settings, making it an ideal testbed for real-world computer-use agents.

By Apurva Gandhi, Vishwas Suryanarayanan, Raja Hasnain Anwar, Firoz Shaik, Shubhang Desai, Thong Q. Nguyen, Muhammad Taqi Raza, Vishal Chowdhary, Graham Neubig
arXiv Machine Learning
Jun 29

Qwen-Image-2.0-RL Technical Report

arXiv:2606. 27608v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: We present Qwen-Image-2.

By Yixian Xu, Kaiyuan Gao, Yuxiang Chen, Yilei Chen, Zecheng Tang, Zihao Liu, Zikai Zhou, Deqing Li, Hao Meng, Kuan Cao, Jiahao Li, Jie Zhang, Liang Peng, Lihan Jiang, Ningyuan Tang, Shengming Yin, Tianhe Wu, Xiaoyue Chen, Yan Shu, Yanran Zhang, Yi Wang, Yu Wu, Yujia Wu, Zekai Zhang, Zhendong Wang, Xiao Xu, Kun Yan, Chenfei Wu
arXiv Computer Vision
Aug 28

RubricRM: Generative Reward Modeling via Dynamic Rubrics for Image Generation and Editing

RubricRM introduces a pairwise generative reward modeling framework that generates an input‑specific rubric—comprising evaluation dimensions, weights, and scoring criteria—to score candidate images. The method is trained in two stages: supervised fine‑tuning to learn the rubric‑based scoring paradigm and GRPO to refine dimension‑level rewards. Experiments on text‑to‑image generation and instruction‑based image editing benchmarks demonstrate that RubricRM outperforms existing specialized reward models and competes with strong proprietary MLLM judges while using smaller backbones.

By Zijian Kan, Wei Wang, Long Luo, Bing Zhao, Xuan Ren, Weixu Qiao, Wenbo Li, Hu Wei, Lin Qu
arXiv AI
Jun 9

IEA: Amateur-Friendly Conversational Image Editing Agent via Three Stages of Multitask Alignment

arXiv:2606. 08016v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Current image editing software often hinges on fixed filters or expert tuning, leaving a gap between amateur users' intent and outcomes.

By Zichen Zhu, Yuheng Sun, Mingxuan Zhu, Wenjie Ma, Situo Zhang, Zhexiang Wang, Ziyue Yang, Danyang Zhang, Kunyao Lan, Zihan Zhao, Dingye Liu, Siqi Xiang, Lu Chen, Kai Yu
arXiv AI
Jun 2

CV-Arena: An Open Benchmark for Instructional Computer Vision Problem Solving with Human-AI Collaborative Preferences

arXiv:2606. 00931v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Instruction-guided image editing is becoming a general interface for visual work, yet existing benchmarks still focus largely on narrow appearance edits and do not fully capture the diversity of real-image tasks in professional workflows.

By Fangzhou Lin, Peiran Li, Lingyu Xu, Wenjing Chen, Qianwen Ge, Shuo Xing, Mingyang Wu, Xiangbo Gao, Siyuan Yang, Kazunori Yamada, Ziming Zhang, Haichong Zhang, Zhen Dong, Ming-Hsuan Yang, Zhengzhong Tu
arXiv AI
Aug 25

ATP-Bench: Towards Agentic Tool Planning for MLLM Interleaved Generation

ATP‑Bench proposes a new benchmark for evaluating agentic tool planning in multimodal large language models (MLLMs) that generate interleaved text-and-image responses. The benchmark contains 7,702 QA pairs, including 1,592 visual‑question‑answer pairs, across eight categories and 25 visual‑critical intents, all verified by humans. A Multi‑Agent MLLM‑as‑a‑Judge (MAM) system is introduced to assess tool‑call precision, missed opportunities, and overall response quality without relying on ground‑truth references.

By Yinuo Liu, Zi Qian, Heng Zhou, Jiahao Zhang, Yajie Zhang, Zhihang Li, Mengyu Zhou, Erchao Zhao, Xiaoxi Jiang, Guanjun Jiang