arXiv:2606. 31154v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Creating and editing slides is a rich, multimodal activity that is ubiquitous in professional and educational settings, making it an ideal testbed for real-world computer-use agents.
By Apurva Gandhi, Vishwas Suryanarayanan, Raja Hasnain Anwar, Firoz Shaik, Shubhang Desai, Thong Q. Nguyen, Muhammad Taqi Raza, Vishal Chowdhary, Graham Neubig
arXiv:2608. 09666v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Recent advances in visual generative models have enabled high-quality image and video generation, but evaluating these models often demands sampling hundreds or thousands of images or videos, which is computationally expensive.
By Shulin Tian, Ziqi Huang, Fan Zhang, Hongyuan Zhu, Yu Qiao, Ziwei Liu
arXiv:2512. 03042v3 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: We introduce PPTArena, a benchmark for PowerPoint editing that evaluates how agents modify real slides from natural-language instructions.
By Michael Ofengenden, Yunze Man, Ziqi Pang, Liang-Yan Gui, Yu-Xiong Wang
arXiv:2606. 27608v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: We present Qwen-Image-2.
By Yixian Xu, Kaiyuan Gao, Yuxiang Chen, Yilei Chen, Zecheng Tang, Zihao Liu, Zikai Zhou, Deqing Li, Hao Meng, Kuan Cao, Jiahao Li, Jie Zhang, Liang Peng, Lihan Jiang, Ningyuan Tang, Shengming Yin, Tianhe Wu, Xiaoyue Chen, Yan Shu, Yanran Zhang, Yi Wang, Yu Wu, Yujia Wu, Zekai Zhang, Zhendong Wang, Xiao Xu, Kun Yan, Chenfei Wu
RubricRM introduces a pairwise generative reward modeling framework that generates an input‑specific rubric—comprising evaluation dimensions, weights, and scoring criteria—to score candidate images. The method is trained in two stages: supervised fine‑tuning to learn the rubric‑based scoring paradigm and GRPO to refine dimension‑level rewards. Experiments on text‑to‑image generation and instruction‑based image editing benchmarks demonstrate that RubricRM outperforms existing specialized reward models and competes with strong proprietary MLLM judges while using smaller backbones.
By Zijian Kan, Wei Wang, Long Luo, Bing Zhao, Xuan Ren, Weixu Qiao, Wenbo Li, Hu Wei, Lin Qu
arXiv:2601.09487v2 Announce Type: replace
Abstract: The rapid evolution of Large Language Models (LLMs) has fostered diverse paradigms for automated slide generation, ranging from code-driven layouts...
By Yunqiao Yang, Wenbo Li, Houxing Ren, Zimu Lu, Ke Wang, Zhiyuan Huang, Zhuofan Zong, Mingjie Zhan, Hongsheng Li
arXiv:2604.18364v2 Announce Type: replace
Abstract: Generating programmatic animation using libraries such as Manim presents unique challenges for Large Language Models (LLMs), requiring spatial reas...
By Ravidu Suien Rammuni Silva, Ahmad Lotfi, Isibor Kennedy Ihianle, Golnaz Shahtahmassebi, Jordan J. Bird
Recent advances in video generative models have enabled high-fidelity, temporally coherent video generation. However, these models often struggle to satisfy prompts requiring specialized knowledge, sp...
arXiv:2606. 08016v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Current image editing software often hinges on fixed filters or expert tuning, leaving a gap between amateur users' intent and outcomes.
By Zichen Zhu, Yuheng Sun, Mingxuan Zhu, Wenjie Ma, Situo Zhang, Zhexiang Wang, Ziyue Yang, Danyang Zhang, Kunyao Lan, Zihan Zhao, Dingye Liu, Siqi Xiang, Lu Chen, Kai Yu
arXiv:2606. 00931v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Instruction-guided image editing is becoming a general interface for visual work, yet existing benchmarks still focus largely on narrow appearance edits and do not fully capture the diversity of real-image tasks in professional workflows.
By Fangzhou Lin, Peiran Li, Lingyu Xu, Wenjing Chen, Qianwen Ge, Shuo Xing, Mingyang Wu, Xiangbo Gao, Siyuan Yang, Kazunori Yamada, Ziming Zhang, Haichong Zhang, Zhen Dong, Ming-Hsuan Yang, Zhengzhong Tu
arXiv:2607. 22632v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: The rapid rise of vlogs as a personalized storytelling medium has created a demand for automated systems to evaluate and refine vlog editing plans.
By Yexiang Liu, Wen Zhong, Sijie Zhu, Xin Gu, Fan Chen, Junxian Duan, Jie Cao, Longyin Wen, Zhenfang Chen
ATP‑Bench proposes a new benchmark for evaluating agentic tool planning in multimodal large language models (MLLMs) that generate interleaved text-and-image responses. The benchmark contains 7,702 QA pairs, including 1,592 visual‑question‑answer pairs, across eight categories and 25 visual‑critical intents, all verified by humans. A Multi‑Agent MLLM‑as‑a‑Judge (MAM) system is introduced to assess tool‑call precision, missed opportunities, and overall response quality without relying on ground‑truth references.
By Yinuo Liu, Zi Qian, Heng Zhou, Jiahao Zhang, Yajie Zhang, Zhihang Li, Mengyu Zhou, Erchao Zhao, Xiaoxi Jiang, Guanjun Jiang