Hugging Face Trending Papers

Multimodal Routing and Region Refinement for Language-Guided Medical Image Segmentation

arXiv Machine Learning
6d ago

Multimodal Routing and Region Refinement for Language-Guided Medical Image Segmentation

Multimodal Routing and Region Refinement for Language-Guided Medical Image Segmentation (MRSeg) is a parameter‑efficient framework that uses frozen ConvNeXt‑Tiny and PubMedBERT encoders to extract multiscale visual features and clinical text tokens. A joint router predicts a sparse mixture over low‑rank adapter bases, enabling separate adaptation for two visual scales and text while keeping feature‑specific parameters distinct. Region Bridge aggregates dense visual tokens into latent regions using text‑derived queries, refines them via self‑attention and text cross‑attention, and redistributes the refined information back to the feature maps, culminating in a multiscale decoder that combines refined semantic features with shallow image evidence. MRSeg achieves state‑of‑the‑art Dice/mIoU scores on QaTa‑COV19 and MosMedData+ with only 7.11 M trainable parameters and 7.60 GFLOPs.

By Md Maklachur Rahman, Md Hasan Al Banna, Saraf Anjum, Assame Arnob, Tracy Hammond
arXiv Computer Vision
Sep 16

BiCLIP: Bidirectional and Consistent Language-Image Processing for Robust Medical Image Segmentation

BiCLIP is a bidirectional multimodal framework that enhances medical image segmentation by allowing visual features to iteratively refine textual representations, improving semantic alignment. It incorporates an augmentation consistency objective to stabilize learning against perturbed inputs. Experiments on QaTa-COV19 and MosMedData+ show that BiCLIP outperforms state‑of‑the‑art image‑only and multimodal baselines, achieving strong performance even with only 1% labeled data and resisting common clinical artifacts such as motion blur and low‑dose CT noise.

By Saivan Talaei, Fatemeh Daneshfar, Abdulhady Abas Abdullah, Mourad Oussalah
arXiv Computer Vision
Aug 25

Localization-Infused Vision-Language Semantic Fusion for Text-Guided Medical Image Segmentation

The paper introduces LoG, a localization‑infused vision‑language fusion framework for text‑guided medical image segmentation. LoG jointly performs multi‑scale target localization to explicitly capture target‑oriented semantics and employs three levels of localization‑infused fusion—feature, attention, and loss—to integrate spatial information into segmentation. Experiments on three benchmark datasets across three imaging modalities show that LoG consistently outperforms state‑of‑the‑art methods.

By Songyue Han, Mingye Zou, Shuchang Ye, Lei Bi, Mingyuan Meng
arXiv AI
Aug 28

MedFG-VQA: Low-Frequency Memory and Graph Attention for Lightweight Medical VQA

MedFG-VQA is a lightweight medical visual question answering framework that uses a memory bank to enhance low‑frequency DCT features and graph‑enhanced cross‑attention for visual‑textual alignment. It introduces Frequency‑Memory Fusion to retrieve and fuse low‑frequency information from a learnable memory bank, and Graph‑Aware Cross‑Attention to refine cross‑modal features via graph convolution. The authors also create SynMed‑VQA, a synthetic dataset of over 2 million QA pairs across nine imaging modalities, and show that MedFG‑VQA matches or outperforms larger models on several biomedical VQA benchmarks while keeping computational costs low.

By Haowen Gu, Gensheng Pei, Zeren Sun, Mingwu Ren, Xiangbo Shu, Yazhou Yao, Fumin Shen
arXiv Computer Vision
Sep 3

Characterizing Text Branch Sensitivity in Medical Vision-Language Segmentation via Evidence Decoupling

The paper investigates how much clinical text influences pixel‑level predictions in multimodal medical image segmentation. It shows that segmentation performance is largely insensitive to the choice of fusion module, but that the impact of text varies across datasets: removing text severely degrades performance on BUSI and BTMRI, while it has only a marginal effect on ISIC and Kvasir‑SEG. Using an Evidence Decoupling Decoder, the authors reveal that text mainly modulates global semantic context rather than spatial localization, and that the specific semantic components driving sensitivity differ by dataset.

By Ziquan Liu, Zhewei Zhu, Xuyang Shi