arXiv:2610.17027v1 Announce Type: new
Abstract: Detecting credit card fraud is notoriously difficult because fraudulent charges make up less than 0.2% of total transactions. Quantum Machine Learning...
By Hitanshi Arora, Mohit Swarnkar, Aswani Kumar Cherukuri
The study evaluates quantum machine learning (QML) models for network intrusion detection against well-tuned classical baselines across four standard datasets, using a leakage-controlled protocol and noise simulation. It introduces a quantum-attribution audit to determine whether any performance gains are truly due to quantum effects. While most tuned classical models match or surpass QML, two quantum approaches— a quantum-kernel SVM and a small hybrid circuit—show statistically significant advantages on specific metrics and tasks.
By Syeda Anshrah Gillani, Mirza Samad Ahmed Baig, Shahid Munir Shah, Asher Ali, Hamzah Siddiqui
The paper introduces Hybrid Quantum Root Cause Analysis (HQ‑RCA), a workflow that applies a hybrid Quantum Graph Neural Network (QGNN) to banking IT operations. HQ‑RCA replaces the classification head of the classical DynEdge GNN with a Variational Quantum Circuit, achieving comparable F1 performance to the strongest classical baseline while simplifying the quantum readout to a single Pauli‑Z expectation. Experiments on 13 k anonymised alarm clusters from a major European bank demonstrate that the quantum component can be executed on NISQ hardware without error mitigation, using a gradient‑free grid scan for optimisation.
By Antonio Greco, Riccardo Paoletti, Roberto Cappuccio, Mario Onorato
arXiv:2608.24631v1 Announce Type: cross
Abstract: Similarity in many decision systems is governed not by distance alone but by interactions among variables. In fraud and anomaly detection, small loca...
By Hanqiu Peng, Jianlong Lu, Ying Chen
arXiv:2510. 03389v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Current quantum computers require algorithms that use limited resources economically.
By Jonas J\"ager, Philipp Els\"asser, Elham Torabian
arXiv:2610.09641v1 Announce Type: cross
Abstract: Photonic quantum computing has recently emerged as a promising platform for hybrid quantum machine learning due to its native realization of linear-o...
By Alberto Marchisio, Hanzalah Mohamed Siraj, Muhammad Kashif, Nouhaila Innan, Muhammad Shafique
arXiv:2607. 20377v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Quantum-kernel methods encode a dataset's geometry in a Gram matrix, so learning claims on hardware kernels assume the intended geometry survives execution.
By Rostyslav Sipakov
arXiv:2609.23476v1 Announce Type: cross
Abstract: A potential path forward is Quantum Machine Learning (QML), which aims to leverage quantum computing in conjunction with classical machine learning t...
By Anand Kumar Mishra, Ramanuj Awasthi
arXiv:2607.21411v1 Announce Type: cross
Abstract: Quantum transfer learning (QTL) is often evaluated by replacing a classical classifier with a fixed variational quantum head, but this hides a key qu...
By Saim Rehman, Nouhaila Innan, Muhammad Shafique
The paper compares classical and hybrid quantum machine learning models for a trigger-like binary classification task using CMS open data. Eight classical models (SVM, ANN, CNN, LSTM) and eight quantum counterparts are evaluated under identical preprocessing, data splits, and decision thresholds, with performance measured by accuracy, ROC‑AUC, F1‑score, precision, and recall. The best classical model is an artificial neural network (93.53 % accuracy, 0.9819 ROC‑AUC), while the best quantum model is a quantum convolutional network (90.89 % accuracy, 0.9731 ROC‑AUC), indicating that within an eight‑qubit budget the quantum models do not surpass the classical ones.
By Tariq Mahmood, Muhammad Awais Rafique, Talab Hussain, Juan Pablo Perez Aguilar, Alfredo Raya, Muhammad Ahsan
arXiv:2606. 04689v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Scene Graph Generation (SGG) requires relational reasoning over objects and their interactions, but performance is often limited by severe long-tail predicate imbalance.
By Prerana Ramkumar, Nouhaila Innan, Muhammad Shafique
The review examines how machine learning can adapt quantum combinatorial optimization workflows by learning decisions such as formulation, penalties, shot budgets, and backend selection. It categorizes the literature into three paradigms—AI for quantum optimization, quantum for AI-driven optimization, and AI‑quantum co‑optimization—and analyzes 119 papers, finding stronger evidence for AI assisting quantum methods than for quantum enhancing learned optimizers. The authors highlight limited experimental controls, introduce an M0‑M5 evidence hierarchy, and argue that scaling is a systems problem requiring careful allocation of classical and quantum resources.
By Hoong Chuin LAU