arXiv Computer Vision

ECGWmark: Deep Watermarking of Electrocardiogram Signals With Error-Correcting Codes

arXiv Computer Vision
Oct 12

ECGWmark: Deep Watermarking for Electrocardiogram Signals

ECGWmark is a fully convolutional, quantization‑free deep watermarking framework designed for electrocardiogram (ECG) signals. It embeds patient metadata into ECGs while preserving high‑frequency diagnostic details by operating in a continuous latent space and using a localized frame‑level mechanism to resist severe temporal desynchronization. A differentiable Physiological Loss guided by a clinical classifier helps maintain diagnostic semantics, achieving over 90% channel‑bit extraction accuracy under circular phase shifts and demonstrating mixed effects on class‑level diagnostic metrics in the MIT‑BIH benchmark.

By Kuan-Yu Chen, Kuan-Chen Wang, Yu Tsao, Jian-Jiun Ding
arXiv Computer Vision
Sep 24

From ECG Signals to Representative-Morphology Heatmaps for Biometric Recognition

The paper introduces representative‑morphology heatmaps, a deterministic ECG‑to‑image representation that averages the five beats closest to the block mean within each ten‑beat block, producing either a conventional trace or a dense cardiac‑time‑by‑lead heatmap. Experiments on PTB, ECG‑ID, and MIMIC‑IV‑ECG‑DEMO show that heatmaps consistently improve verification and identification performance across 15 compact models, reducing EER by an average of 9.59 percentage points and increasing Rank‑1 by 24.69 points. The study also demonstrates that ImageNet initialization benefits multilead datasets, that performance does not scale monotonically with model size, and that useful channel combinations vary by cohort and biometric task.

By Athanasios Angelakis, Marta Gomez-Barrero
arXiv Machine Learning
Jul 31

ECG-InterpBench: Benchmarking the Interpretability of ECG Foundation Models with Matched-Scale Sparse Autoencoders

arXiv:2607. 27404v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Existing benchmarks for electrocardiogram foundation models primarily evaluate downstream predictive performance, providing limited insight into whether their internal representations can be faithfully decomposed, clinically interpreted, or reproduced across independent analyses.

By Yixuan Duan, Wei Qiu
arXiv AI
Sep 16

Decoder Design Matters for ECG Delineation

The paper introduces R‑U‑Net, an ECG delineation model that combines a ResNet‑18 encoder with a U‑Net decoder. It demonstrates that this decoder design outperforms a ResNet‑18 + fully convolutional network baseline across 16 in‑domain settings and improves cross‑domain performance by 8.1 mIoU. Ablation studies reveal that the decoder contributes more to performance gains than the evaluated semi‑supervised learning methods.

By Joseph Scharpf, William Han, Chaojing Duan, Michael A. Rosenberg, Emerson Liu, Ding Zhao
arXiv AI
Aug 5

FOUND-AF: Benchmarking ECG Foundation Models for Atrial Fibrillation Detection

arXiv:2608. 03597v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common sustained cardiac arrhythmia and is associated with increased risks of stroke, heart failure, and mortality.

By Amirhossein Taleshinosrati, Yangyang Wang, Atitaya Phoemsuk, Vahid Abolghasemi, Naser Hossein Motlagh, Sadasivan Puthusserypady, Daniel Teichmann, Abdolrahman Peimankar
arXiv Machine Learning
Oct 8

BeatFlow-ECG: Rectified Flow for ECG Reconstruction from Indirect Wearable Signals

BeatFlow-ECG is a conditional rectified‑flow model that reconstructs single‑channel ECG signals from synchronized photoplethysmography (PPG) and inertial measurement unit (IMU) data. The architecture uses a convolutional encoder‑decoder with a transformer bottleneck and explicit flow‑time conditioning, incorporating motion information through IMU‑derived features, motion‑dependent loss weighting, and a curriculum learning strategy. Evaluated on PPG‑DaLiA and WESAD datasets with leave‑one‑subject‑out protocols, BeatFlow‑ECG outperforms deterministic, adversarial, and diffusion‑based baselines, achieving Pearson correlations of 0.983–0.986 and R‑peak F1 scores of 0.946–0.955, while reducing L1 error compared to Conditional DDPM‑1D.

By Mohamed Kamel, Sahar Selim, Walaa Medhat, Tamer Nadeem