arXiv:2606. 01632v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Estimating the economic contribution of a single patent inside a product that embodies tens of thousands of patents is a long-standing unsolved problem in intellectual property economics.
arXiv:2606. 09556v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: AI Scientist agents are often evaluated as if capability were mainly a function of model quality, prompting, or reasoning scaffolds.
arXiv:2608.21924v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Patent litigation imposes substantial costs on firms and distorts R&D incentives, making early risk identification a practically important task. While...
arXiv:2605. 07663v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Data valuation methods allocate payments and audit training data's contribution to machine-learning pipelines; however, they often assume passive contributors.
arXiv:2603. 03672v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: The Shapley value provides a principled foundation for data valuation, but exact computation is #P-hard due to the exponential coalition space.
QuantumNovelty is an open‑source, skill‑orchestrating language agent that both creates quantum‑computing artifacts—such as papers, ansatz candidates, and patent drafts—and evaluates them through simulated referee and patent‑examiner panels. Its core innovation is an audit‑and‑falsify layer of deterministic gates (Pareto domination, numerical recomputation, Wilson intervals, and cross‑vendor consensus) that restricts claims to those that survive rigorous checks, with every model call logged for transparency. In initial tests on a planted adversarial corpus and a small real‑world deployment, the system successfully flagged all overclaims without false positives and produced panels that were more conservative than typical public acceptance rates.
arXiv:2607. 23733v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Firms struggle to choose AI projects that pay off: two projects can look equally promising to smart, motivated stakeholders and yet deserve opposite decisions.
arXiv:2606. 05104v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Knowledge benchmarks for LLMs face three issues: scaling-driven designs that do not operationalize disciplinary representativeness; flat-payment annotation that permits lazy consensus; and unaudited ranking instability under bounded test budgets.
arXiv:2605. 04135v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Readers of applied-domain LLM capability evaluations want to know what AI systems can currently do.
arXiv:2608. 10441v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Many pipelines can pay a per-example cost to acquire an auxiliary, model-derived observation -- an LLM's structured reasoning, a slow oracle, an expensive measurement -- and then must decide when the acquired signal is worth using.
arXiv:2608. 14747v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: WANDR (Wide ANd Deep Research) is a benchmark of 500 realistic, challenging data-collection tasks for research agents.
The paper investigates a failure mode in Graph-JEPA, a joint‑embedding predictive model trained on a large scientific‑reasoning graph. Despite achieving high linear‑probe accuracy and effective rank, the learned representation contains almost no usable instance information, as shown by retrieval metrics. The authors diagnose the issue to variance allocation in the objective, propose a repair that restores near‑perfect information recovery, and demonstrate that the problem persists even after repair, highlighting limitations in the evaluation metrics used.
arXiv:2608. 20106v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: We introduce OenoBench, a wine-domain knowledge benchmark of 3,266 multiple-choice questions across six pillars (regions, grape varieties, viticulture, winemaking, producers, business) and four difficulty tiers.