Hugging Face Blog

Optimization story: Bloom inference

arXiv Machine Learning
Sep 18

Bayesian Optimization with Rich Auxiliary Information via LLMs

The paper introduces Bayesian Optimization (BO) techniques that incorporate rich auxiliary information—such as training curves, expert notes, images, and prior knowledge—using large language models (LLMs). Three new methods are proposed to integrate this auxiliary data into BO, and they are evaluated on hyperparameter optimization benchmarks and a real-world nuclear fusion task. The results show that these LLM-enhanced BO methods consistently outperform standard BO and existing LLM-based optimization approaches.

By Tejus Gupta, Efe Mert Karag\"ozl\"u, Rohit Sonker, Barnab\'as P\'oczos, Jeff Schnieder
Hugging Face Trending Papers
Jun 25

Scientific discovery as meta-optimization: a combinatorial optimization case study

Scientific discovery is fundamentally an optimization problem, defined by a vast "state space" of theories and experiments, and an evaluation criterion based on quality, novelty, and validity. Large language models (LLMs) have enabled automated exploration of this space, but we argue that simultaneous modification of the evaluation criteria is equally important.

Hugging Face Trending Papers
Aug 13

DARTree: Speculative Diffusion Decoding with Autoregressive Draft Trees

Speculative decoding losslessly accelerates autoregressive language models by verifying multiple draft tokens in parallel. Diffusion-based drafters further reduce proposal latency by predicting an entire token block in parallel, but their position-wise distributions are marginal rather than conditioned on tokens selected along each draft path.

arXiv AI
Sep 7

LLM-Guided Program Evolution for Circle Packing: Breaking 10 Packomania Records for $28

The paper introduces Discovery Loop, a lightweight system that employs a large language model (LLM) to iteratively evolve optimization algorithms for the Packomania circle‑packing benchmark. Starting from a simple seed solver, the LLM proposes algorithmic improvements guided by a scoreboard and a history of prior ideas, evaluates each candidate against an independent verifier, and retains only successful changes. Within 15 iterations and a total LLM cost of $27.72, the system broke 10 Packomania records for N between 101 and 114, improving the best known solutions by 2.4%–5.4%. The work demonstrates that a cost‑efficient, LLM‑driven approach can rapidly advance state‑of‑the‑art solutions in a complex optimization domain, suggesting broader potential for democratizing automated scientific discovery.

By Wes Sander