The paper introduces the Neural Function Minimizer (NFM), an iterative neural model that predicts the global minimum of a noisy one‑dimensional function from only twenty samples. It compares the NFM to two Set Transformers and classical zero‑query estimators, finding that all learned models outperform classical methods on held‑out data, with the NFM achieving the lowest error relative to the Gaussian‑process posterior argmin. The study also examines how different estimator outputs affect tie‑breaking between equally deep valleys and plans to release a benchmark and self‑checking harness.
By Qusay Muzaffar, David Levin, Michael Werman
Prior Fitted Networks (PFNs) such as TabPFN now rival established statistical procedures across prediction and estimation tasks. A natural explanation is that PFNs have the property of statistical ada...
The paper investigates why neural network surrogates sometimes improve and sometimes worsen derivative‑free optimisation performance. It identifies three key factors—role (whether the surrogate proposes candidates or replaces gradients), radius (the neighbourhood within which a local model is reliable), and room (whether the base method can still progress)—that determine when a learned local model is beneficial. Experiments on 117 benchmark instances show that providing surrogate‑approved candidates boosts success rates, while replacing gradients or ignoring the radius can reduce them.
By Chengkuo Bian, Pengcheng Xie
arXiv:2610.07804v1 Announce Type: new
Abstract: Prior Fitted Networks (PFNs) such as TabPFN now rival established statistical procedures across prediction and estimation tasks. A natural explanation...
By Martin Eppert, Krishna Balasubramanian, Subhro Ghosh, Jason Klusowski, Yan Shuo Tan
arXiv:2607. 16821v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Task arithmetic, sequential fine-tuning, activation steering, and first-order random search all operate through relatively small perturbations around an already trained checkpoint, and they rely on different local approximations: individual perturbations should be first-order predictable, task updates should compose with controlled interference, useful tangent structure should be stable and possible to estimate, and weight edits should have counterparts in representation space.
By Irina Piontkovskaia, Sergey Nikolenko
arXiv:2606. 19491v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Pretrained transformers sit near singular minima of the loss, where the Fisher information metric degenerates along dead directions: directions in parameter space along which the directional Fisher vanishes.
By Tejas Pradeep Shirodkar, P. J. Narayanan
arXiv:2607. 10203v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Adaptive-compute world models -- early-exit or mixture-of-depths predictors that spend variable depth per step -- assume depth buys better predictions and can be routed adaptively.
By Achyuthan Sivasankar
A deep network's loss is invariant to continuous symmetries of its parameters: the logit shift, the ReLU rescaling, the LayerNorm scale, the per-head attention rotation. Adam's per-coordinate preconditioner drifts along each symmetry orbit, which pulls the trajectory off the symmetry quotient where the optimization lives and blurs the singular-learning rate the quotient makes readable.
arXiv:2607. 08946v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: A transformer can be built from operators that are legible by construction -- bounded, named units that read as fuzzy set operations rather than dense activations -- but legibility must be pressed for during training, and the pressure has a failure mode.
By Mark Oskin
arXiv:2607. 05872v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Memory-efficient optimizers such as GaLore train large language models by projecting gradients onto a rank-r subspace recomputed every T steps, assuming this subspace is a slowly drifting object that can be tracked.
By Noel Thomas
arXiv:2608. 10251v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: A transformer's answer lives on one axis: the direction its unembedding reads.
By Mark Oskin
arXiv:2606. 29176v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: A deep network's loss is invariant to continuous symmetries of its parameters: the logit shift, the ReLU rescaling, the LayerNorm scale, the per-head attention rotation.
By Tejas Pradeep Shirodkar