arXiv:2606. 26460v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: AI-based scientific automation is increasingly possible by using agents to generate hypotheses, design experiments, and analyze data.
By Ben Prystawski, Kushin Mukherjee, Daniel Wurgaft, Linas Nasvytis, Michael Y. Li, Noah D. Goodman, Michael C. Frank
arXiv:2606. 03471v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: This paper proposes, for the first time, a rigorous formal definition of the concept of Machine Theory of Mind, based on principles supported by evidence from cognitive psychology, neuroscience and artificial intelligence, and uses the above as a lens to examine state-of-the-art and current efforts in the field, driving a potential agenda for further research there able to "crack" the problem.
By Fabio Cuzzolin
As AI agents are increasingly deployed in complex environments, understanding their behaviors becomes critical. Yet behavioral scientific research on AI agents remains manual and labor-intensive.
arXiv:2608. 10030v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: As AI agents are increasingly deployed in complex environments, understanding their behaviors becomes critical.
By Soo Yong Lee, Jongha Lee, Jaewan Chun, Hyunjin Hwang, Fanchen Bu, Ziv Ben-Zion, Taekwan Kim, Denny Borsboom, Jaemin Yoo, Kijung Shin
arXiv:2608. 14407v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: We present a survey of the past and future of AI Scientists: machines capable of automating science.
By Ross D. King
arXiv:2510. 05743v3 Announce Type: replace Abstract: We review the historical development and current trends of artificially intelligent agents (agentic AI) in the social and behavioral sciences: from the first programmable computers, and social simulations soon thereafter, to today's experiments with large language models.
By Petter Holme, Milena Tsvetkova
arXiv:2606. 15497v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: The automation of science is a long-standing ambition in the field of AI.
By Yutaro Yamada, Robert Tjarko Lange, Cong Lu, Chris Lu, Shengran Hu, Jakob Foerster, David Ha, Jeff Clune
arXiv:2510. 02660v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: When researchers claim AI systems possess ToM or mental models, they are fundamentally discussing behavioral predictions and bias corrections rather than genuine mental states.
By Xiaoyun Yin, Elmira Zahmat Doost, Shiwen Zhou, Garima Arya Yadav, Jamie C. Gorman
arXiv:2608. 02775v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Scientific discovery has advanced through successive transformations in the organization of knowledge.
By Xinjie Yao, Xingxin Xu, Xiyuan Gao, Zhoupeng Guo, Kunlong Yang, Dengyu Zhao, Siqi Zhao, Zhihe Fan, Yichen Dong, Xin Li, Jiekang Feng, Jiahe Wu, Sen Wang, Beiming Yu, Kejia Zhao, Ruipu Zhao, Jiaqi Zhou, Heyang Li, Jianjun Chen, Anbo Dai, Xin Liu, Zhengtao Yu, Qinghua Hu, Pengfei Zhu
arXiv:2606. 26448v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Across the sciences, autonomous systems are increasingly being used in closed-loop discovery, proposing new theories and designing and running experiments to test them.
By Akshay K. Jagadish, Younes Strittmatter, Nori Jacoby, George Kachergis, Eric Schulz, Nathaniel Daw, Suyog H. Chandramouli, Thomas L. Griffiths
A collection of science tools and experiments to expand the scale and precision of scientific exploration.
arXiv:2608. 12036v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: AI models have achieved remarkable success across diverse domains, yet the mechanisms underlying their capabilities and the risks they may pose remain poorly understood.
By Mengru Wang, Junfeng Fang, Shuofei Qiao, Zhenqian Xu, Haoming Xu, Haoxiong Wang, Shumin Deng, Linyi Yang, Zhixiang Cui, Xin Xu, Yunzhi Yao, Buqiang Xu, Fei Shen, Haozhe Luo, Yunxiang Wei, Ningyu Zhang, Julian McAuley, Tat Seng Chua, Huajun Chen