arXiv:2607. 25865v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Quantum error correction (QEC) is indispensable for scalable fault-tolerant quantum computing.
arXiv:2508. 20134v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Programming quantum circuits at the OpenQASM level is essential for achieving hardware-aware optimization and reliable execution on noisy intermediate-scale quantum (NISQ) devices, yet it remains challenging due to the need for domain-specific planning, iterative code synthesis, and low-level calibration.
arXiv:2605. 25572v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: The growing complexity of quantum programming frameworks has exposed a critical limitation in existing large language model (LLM)-based code assistants: general-purpose models hallucinate PennyLane-specific gate names, misplace device configurations, and produce structurally invalid circuits when faced with specialized quantum coding challenges.
arXiv:2605. 30358v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Quantum computing remains in the Noisy Intermediate-Scale Quantum (NISQ) era, with performance constrained by noise.
arXiv:2608. 12936v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: As quantum computing progresses from proof-of-principle demonstrations toward practical utility, a significant impediment is the need to augment algorithmic feasibility with system-level optimization across heterogeneous hardware and software stacks.
As quantum computing progresses from proof-of-principle demonstrations toward practical utility, a significant impediment is the need to augment algorithmic feasibility with system-level optimization across heterogeneous hardware and software stacks. Quantum resource estimation (QRE) plays a central role in this transition, yet existing approaches remain largely compilation-heavy or domain-knowledge-guided symbolic annotations, and tightly coupled to long-term fault-tolerant assumptions, limiting their topical applicability.
arXiv:2607. 05814v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Real-time decoding is a major bottleneck in scaling quantum error correction (QEC) from noisy intermediate-scale quantum (NISQ) devices to fault-tolerant quantum computing.
arXiv:2608. 07743v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Identifying a meaningful quantum speedup requires more than matching a classical problem to a familiar quantum primitive: the claim must preserve the task, respect access and output models, expose required promises, and remain within a defensible complexity scope.
QEncodeBench evaluates whether large language models can translate classical constraint problems into verified quantum phase oracles. The benchmark measures the correctness of generated circuits using an adversarial self‑validated verifier that checks full solution‑set equivalence while enforcing resource limits. Results show that models lacking a reasoning mode perform poorly, whereas enabling native reasoning improves accuracy tenfold; semantic errors dominate, and neuro‑symbolic pipelines close most gaps by delegating critical composition to deterministic procedures.
arXiv:2607. 24714v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Trapped-ion quantum computers rely on shuttling compilers, which cast an input algorithm into a sequence of ion-qubit movements within a given architecture.
arXiv:2608. 08996v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Quantum low-density parity-check (qLDPC) codes can encode multiple logical qubits using sparse parity checks, yet searching for useful finite-length instances remains a challenging design problem because code performance must be optimized while satisfying practical constraints.
arXiv:2607. 25647v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: As quantum computing continually improves, ensuring the reliability and correctness of quantum libraries has become increasingly critical.
The paper reports on shuttling compilers for trapped‑ion quantum computers that are built using five large language models (LLMs) fine‑tuned on hand‑crafted shuttling schedules for linear and branched one‑dimensional trap architectures. For circuits up to 16 qubits, the fine‑tuned LLMs produce valid schedules on the training architectures, and in 12% of compilations the best of ten runs achieves up to 21% fewer operations than heuristic baselines after rule‑based post‑processing. A single run of one LLM also generates a valid schedule for a previously unseen four‑way branched architecture, providing preliminary evidence of cross‑architecture generalization, though no LLM succeeded on two other unseen architectures.