As quantum computing progresses from proof-of-principle demonstrations toward practical utility, a significant impediment is the need to augment algorithmic feasibility with system-level optimization across heterogeneous hardware and software stacks. Quantum resource estimation (QRE) plays a central role in this transition, yet existing approaches remain largely compilation-heavy or domain-knowledge-guided symbolic annotations, and tightly coupled to long-term fault-tolerant assumptions, limiting their topical applicability.
arXiv:2608. 12936v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: As quantum computing progresses from proof-of-principle demonstrations toward practical utility, a significant impediment is the need to augment algorithmic feasibility with system-level optimization across heterogeneous hardware and software stacks.
arXiv:2411.10406v4 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: In the span of four decades, quantum computation has evolved from an intellectual curiosity to a potentially realizable technology. Today, sm...
arXiv:2510. 03389v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Current quantum computers require algorithms that use limited resources economically.
arXiv:2607. 25865v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Quantum error correction (QEC) is indispensable for scalable fault-tolerant quantum computing.
arXiv:2508. 20134v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Programming quantum circuits at the OpenQASM level is essential for achieving hardware-aware optimization and reliable execution on noisy intermediate-scale quantum (NISQ) devices, yet it remains challenging due to the need for domain-specific planning, iterative code synthesis, and low-level calibration.
The paper introduces MQSS-Selector, a reinforcement‑learning guided pass selection system for an MLIR compilation pipeline aimed at unified High Performance Computing‑Quantum Computing (HPCQC) infrastructures. It addresses the challenges of Noisy Intermediate‑Scale Quantum (NISQ) devices by integrating device selection, compiler‑pass optimization, and job queue scheduling into a single learning‑based framework. The selector can simultaneously optimize multiple objectives—fidelity, compilation time, and scheduling latency—while adapting to circuit characteristics and device conditions.
arXiv:2607. 01329v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: The geometric and topological structure of quantum cost landscapes (QCLs) governs the optimization and thus the predictive power of variational quantum algorithms (VQAs).
arXiv:2606. 11620v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Approximate tensor-network simulators enable classical simulation of quantum circuits beyond the reach of exact methods, but selecting optimal approximation parameters -- such as bond dimension thresholds -- remains a costly trial-and-error process.
QEncodeBench evaluates whether large language models can translate classical constraint problems into verified quantum phase oracles. The benchmark measures the correctness of generated circuits using an adversarial self‑validated verifier that checks full solution‑set equivalence while enforcing resource limits. Results show that models lacking a reasoning mode perform poorly, whereas enabling native reasoning improves accuracy tenfold; semantic errors dominate, and neuro‑symbolic pipelines close most gaps by delegating critical composition to deterministic procedures.
arXiv:2607. 18552v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Quantum reservoir computing (QRC) uses the dynamics of a fixed or weakly tuned quantum system to transform temporal and sequential inputs into measured features, while training is typically confined to a classical readout.
arXiv:2605. 22097v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Photonic quantum computing is a promising platform for scalable quantum machine learning, but designing effective hybrid architectures remains challenging under hardware and optimization constraints.
The paper proposes reverse n‑wise output‑oriented testing for AI/ML and quantum computing systems, a method that builds covering arrays over output equivalence classes, confidence buckets, decision boundaries, fairness partitions, embedding clusters, ranking stability bands, quantum measurement distributions, and error syndrome patterns. It then uses gradient‑free metaheuristic optimization to solve the inverse mapping problem, generating input configurations or quantum circuit parameters that trigger specific behavioral signatures in opaque models. The framework claims to provide explicit coverage guarantees, higher fault detection rates for calibration, boundary, and error syndromes, improved test suite efficiency, and automated partition discovery for MLOps and quantum validation pipelines.