Scaling laws promised cost-effective experiments; six years later, they have yet to fully deliver. Instead, researchers have found them unreliable at small scales (starting at 4M parameters) and concluded that sizable models cannot be avoided.
arXiv:2602. 10545v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Modern large-scale neural networks are often trained and released in multiple sizes to accommodate diverse inference budgets.
By Yuxin Ma, Nan Chen, Mateo D\'iaz, Soufiane Hayou, Dmitriy Kunisky, Soledad Villar
arXiv:2605. 29548v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Larger models learn tasks smaller models do not.
By Jing Huang, Daniel Wurgaft, Rachit Bansal, Laura Ruis, Naomi Saphra, David Alvarez-Melis, Andrew Kyle Lampinen, Christopher Potts, Ekdeep Singh Lubana
arXiv:2606. 27282v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Time-series forecasting research has been moving steadily toward larger architectures, from specialized transformers to general-purpose foundation models, on the assumption that capacity is what unlocks accuracy.
By Lang Huang, Jinglue Xu, Luke Darlow
Time-series forecasting research has been moving steadily toward larger architectures, from specialized transformers to general-purpose foundation models, on the assumption that capacity is what unlocks accuracy. We take the opposite position: most of the gap can be closed at far lower cost by tuning preprocessing rather than scaling models.
arXiv:2606. 07616v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Scaling laws provide a fundamental framework for understanding the performance of Language Models (LMs), yet deriving them requires prohibitively expensive evaluations across thousands of checkpoints or millions of inference samples.
By Sang Truong, Yuheng Tu, Rylan Schaeffer, Sanmi Koyejo
arXiv:2511. 12081v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Despite massive investments in scale, deep models for click-through rate (CTR) prediction often exhibit rapidly diminishing returns -- a stark contrast to the {predictable scaling laws} seen in large language models (LLMs).
By Bencheng Yan, Yuejie Lei, Zhiyuan Zeng, Zheye Deng, Di Wang, Kaiyi Lin, Pengjie Wang, Chuan Yu, Jian Xu, Bo Zheng
arXiv:2512. 22088v3 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: The scaling law, a cornerstone of Large Language Model (LLM) development, predicts improvements in model performance with increasing computational resources.
By Chiwun Yang
arXiv:2604. 22753v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Scaling laws are used to plan multi-million-dollar training runs, but fitting those laws can itself cost millions.
By Sijie Li, Shanda Li, Haowei Lin, Weiwei Sun, Ameet Talwalkar, Yiming Yang
The largest machine learning models in particle physics are also the most expensive to train, yet the return on scaling a given architecture cannot be estimated before that compute is spent. Scaling laws have been fit for jets, but none has yet been shown to predict the performance of models it was not fit on.
arXiv:2606. 25008v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Neural scaling laws describe how pre-training loss decays as power laws with training time, model size, and compute.
By Yizhou Liu, Jeff Gore
arXiv:2603. 24226v4 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Recent advances in Large Language Models (LLMs) have inspired a surge of scaling research in industrial search, advertising, and recommendation systems.
By Liren Yu, Caiyuan Li, Feiyi Dong, Tao Zhang, Zhixuan Zhang, Dan Ou, Haihong Tang, Bo Zheng