arXiv Machine Learning

Small-Scale Experiments: Are We There Yet?

arXiv:2608. 11859v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Scaling laws promised cost-effective experiments; six years later, they have yet to fully deliver.

Hugging Face Trending Papers
Aug 12

Small-Scale Experiments: Are We There Yet?

Scaling laws promised cost-effective experiments; six years later, they have yet to fully deliver. Instead, researchers have found them unreliable at small scales (starting at 4M parameters) and concluded that sizable models cannot be avoided.

Hugging Face Trending Papers
Jun 25

How Good Can Linear Models Be for Time-Series Forecasting?

Time-series forecasting research has been moving steadily toward larger architectures, from specialized transformers to general-purpose foundation models, on the assumption that capacity is what unlocks accuracy. We take the opposite position: most of the gap can be closed at far lower cost by tuning preprocessing rather than scaling models.

arXiv AI
Jun 9

Item Response Scaling Laws: A Measurement Theory Approach for Efficient and Generalizable Neural Scaling Estimation

arXiv:2606. 07616v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Scaling laws provide a fundamental framework for understanding the performance of Language Models (LMs), yet deriving them requires prohibitively expensive evaluations across thousands of checkpoints or millions of inference samples.

By Sang Truong, Yuheng Tu, Rylan Schaeffer, Sanmi Koyejo
arXiv Machine Learning
Jun 2

From Scaling to Structured Expressivity: Rethinking Transformers for CTR Prediction

arXiv:2511. 12081v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Despite massive investments in scale, deep models for click-through rate (CTR) prediction often exhibit rapidly diminishing returns -- a stark contrast to the {predictable scaling laws} seen in large language models (LLMs).

By Bencheng Yan, Yuejie Lei, Zhiyuan Zeng, Zheye Deng, Di Wang, Kaiyi Lin, Pengjie Wang, Chuan Yu, Jian Xu, Bo Zheng