arXiv Machine Learning

From Scaling to Structured Expressivity: Rethinking Transformers for CTR Prediction

arXiv:2511. 12081v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Despite massive investments in scale, deep models for click-through rate (CTR) prediction often exhibit rapidly diminishing returns -- a stark contrast to the {predictable scaling laws} seen in large language models (LLMs).

arXiv Machine Learning
1d ago

Learning Rate Transfer for Hybrid Transformer-SSM Architectures

arXiv:2610. 01172v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: We study learning rate (LR) scaling for hybrid architectures combining Transformer and State-Space Model (SSM) blocks, a class adopted by several recent production language models.

By Jimin Seo, Gyubok Lee, Yeonsik Jo, Kiwoong Yoo, Yeongoon Kim, Minhae Oh, Jin Woo Koo, Suhwan Kim, Nakyung Lee, Minsik Seol, Idris Nechnech, Jaehyeon Kim, Giho Lee, Jungwoo Lee
arXiv AI
Aug 18

SAPE: Sandwich Adapters for Parameter Efficiency in Large Language Model Fine-Tuning

arXiv:2608. 15360v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: While Parameter-Efficient Fine-Tuning (PEFT) has substantially reduced the hardware cost of adapting Large Language Models (LLMs) by decreasing the number of trainable parameters, recent studies have sought to further improve PEFT through parameter sharing.

By Mohammad Aref Jafari-Raddani, Morteza Mohajjel Kafshdooz
arXiv Machine Learning
Aug 28

Squeezing More from Limited Data with Recursive Transformers

The paper investigates how to effectively pre‑train language models when the data budget is limited but compute is plentiful. It shows that increasing model size only improves performance up to an optimal point, after which overfitting degrades generalization, and that this optimal size varies with both the data budget and downstream tasks. To overcome the inefficiencies of standard Transformers in this regime, the authors propose recursive Transformers that reuse a shared block across depth and employ factorized embeddings, achieving better results than standard models on 10M–100M word pre‑training budgets and competitive performance with BabyLM Challenge 2025 winners.

By Serdar G\"ulbahar, Lukas Edman, Alexander Fraser
arXiv Computation and Language
Aug 31

Pruning Laws for Large Language Models

arXiv:2504.04342v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Scaling up model parameters and training data consistently improves the performance of large language models (LLMs), but at the cost of rapidly gro...

By Ayan Sengupta, Siddhant Chaudhary, Tanmoy Chakraborty
arXiv Machine Learning
Aug 31

Negligible in Size, Significant in Effect: On Scale Vectors in Large Language Models

The paper investigates the often-overlooked scale vectors in large language models, showing that despite their tiny size they are crucial for pre‑training performance. The authors provide theoretical insights that scale vectors mainly aid optimization rather than expressivity, and they analyze how weight decay affects different normalization layers. Building on these findings, they propose lightweight improvements—branch‑specific heterogeneity, better placement, and magnitude‑direction reparameterization—that consistently reduce loss across a range of model sizes and training settings.

By Mingze Wang, Shuchen Zhu, Yuxin Fang, Binghui Li, Kai Shen, Shu Zhong
arXiv Computation and Language
Aug 31

CoFrGeNet: Continued Fraction Architectures for Language Generation

CoFrGeNet introduces Continued Fraction Generative Networks, a new function class that replaces Multi-head Attention and Feed-Forward Networks in Transformer blocks with fewer parameters. The architecture includes custom gradient formulations for efficient optimization and can be plugged into existing Transformer workflows with minimal changes. Experiments on GPT2‑xl and Llama3 show competitive or superior performance on downstream tasks while using 1/2 to 2/3 of the original parameters and shorter pre‑training time.

By Amit Dhurandhar, Vijil Chenthamarakshan, Dennis Wei, Tejaswini Pedapati, Karthikeyan Natesan Ramamurthy, Rahul Nair
arXiv Machine Learning
Sep 14

Breaking the Token Ceiling: Distilling Smaller, Stronger Byte Models

The paper investigates whether small models distilled from larger ones behave similarly when using byte versus token tokenization. It introduces two methods—Marginalize‑It (approximate) and End‑Of‑Token (exact)—to convert token logits to byte logits, and conducts a large‑scale study on decoder‑only dense transformers ranging from 1 billion to 1 trillion bytes of data. Results show that while token‑based models excel early, byte‑based models eventually surpass them with more compute, achieving higher performance ceilings, greater data efficiency, and lower logit storage costs.

By Kalyani Marathe, Artidoro Pagnoni, Tomasz Limisiewicz, Margaret Li, Mike Lewis, Luke Zettlemoyer, Srinivasan Iyer
arXiv AI
Sep 1

Tensor Methods for Language Models: From Token Representation to Training, Adaptation, Inference, Compression, and Interpretability

This survey reviews tensor methods applied to large language models, framing them through a seven‑stage lifecycle (tokenization, embeddings, pre‑training, adaptation, compression, inference, interpretability) and a component view (embeddings, attention, feed‑forward networks). It offers unified notation, theoretical foundations, and comparative analyses of tensorization strategies for Transformer components, while highlighting evaluation protocol differences and model scale effects. The paper also introduces a new metric, ρ_gap, to quantify the gap between theoretical memory savings and actual system‑level speedup, and connects tensor techniques to related efficiency and probabilistic methods.

By Matvei Tarasov, Salman Ahmadi-Asl, Andre L. F. de Almeida, Andrzej Cichocki