arXiv AI

SIDScope: A Diagnostic Resource for Semantic-ID Interfaces in Generative Recommendation

SIDScope is a diagnostic tool that evaluates Semantic‑ID interfaces used in generative recommendation systems. It normalizes item‑to‑code artifacts, verifies provenance, profiles mapping structure, and compares revisions while tracking path‑to‑item outcomes in generated traces. Using nine tokenizer exports from Amazon and Yelp data, SIDScope shows that interface health depends on multiple signals and reveals gaps in prefix alignment, trace accounting, and mapping refresh effects.

Hugging Face Trending Papers
Aug 19

SIDScope: A Diagnostic Resource for Semantic-ID Interfaces in Generative Recommendation

SIDScope is a diagnostic tool that evaluates Semantic-ID mappings used between item tokenizers and generative recommenders. It normalizes artifacts, verifies provenance, profiles mapping structure, compares revisions, and tracks path-to-item outcomes in generated traces. Using data from Amazon and Yelp, SIDScope shows that interface health depends on multiple signals, revealing gaps in prefix alignment, trace accounting, and refresh handling that affect model reuse.

arXiv AI
Jul 3

ContextNest: Verifiable Context Governance for Autonomous AI Agent

arXiv:2607. 02116v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Autonomous AI agents increasingly depend on external knowledge stores, yet most retrieval pipelines provide relevance without durable guarantees of provenance, version identity, integrity, traceability, or point-in-time reconstruction.

By Misha Sulpovar (PromptOwl, LLC), Benn R. Konsynski (Goizueta Business School, Emory University), Qaish Kanchwala (IBM Research), Gabe Goodhart (IBM Research)
arXiv Machine Learning
Oct 16

CascadeLedger: Counterfactual Auditing of Information and Resource Integrity in LLM Cascades

CascadeLedger is a counterfactual execution‑audit framework designed for budgeted language‑model cascades. It enforces call‑before‑read semantics, records service and cache identities, and freezes event traces before scoring, ensuring that two executions can share a final answer and resource projection only if their routing decisions used legitimately observable information. The framework introduces counterfactual prefix non‑interference (CPNI), counterfactual influence frontier (CIF), and projection‑preserving adversarial mutation (PPAM) to detect and localize violations, achieving a clean false‑positive rate and high detection rates for serialized and hidden‑read faults while quantifying overhead for online and offline audits.

By Miaobo Hu, Shuhao Hu, Xiaobo Guo, Xin Wang, Bokun Wang, Daren Zha, Jun Xiao
arXiv AI
Oct 21

Evolving Semantic Indexes for Generative Retrieval

arXiv:2610.28568v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Generative retrieval (GR) casts search and recommendation as autoregressive generation of discrete semantic identifiers (SIDs). SID design largely dete...

By Jinming Nian, Jyun-Yu Jiang, Henry Tsai, Yi Fang, Zhirong Liang
arXiv Computation and Language
Aug 31

Fidelity Is Not Enough: Dispatch-Level Instrumentation for Agentic Datasheet Extraction

The paper reports that a model can pass fidelity checks—verifying that extracted values match the source—without actually opening a datasheet, due to a hidden constraint that disables tool use. To address this, the authors log every tool call in an agentic benchmark and develop two instruments: a rule‑based failure‑attribution classifier and a silent‑failure detector that flags runs based solely on which tools were invoked. While the detector shows low false positives on clean extractions and recovers all planted faults, its recall against correct tool usage but incorrect answers remains unmeasured, and a partial causal chamber confirms only a subset of claims, highlighting limitations in physical verification.

By Qing Ye, Meng-Hsuan Lin
arXiv AI
Oct 2

Actions with Receipts: Jointly Binding Claims, Evidence, and Execution for Replayable Tool-Agent Auditing

The paper introduces a claim‑anchored execution contract that binds a tool‑using agent’s emitted claim to its exact source span, the ordered execution prefix that produced it, and the source version and access state observed. Each receipt contains deterministic anchors, source identifiers, offsets, hashes, quotes, and a domain‑separated execution commitment, allowing a verifier to reconstruct these bindings before semantic or task labels are joined. The contract defines seven independently testable properties and demonstrates high detection rates against cross‑object attacks, with strong performance on conflict‑aware support guard evaluations.

By Miaobo Hu, Shuhao Hu, Xiaobo Guo, Xin Wang, Bokun Wang, Yina Sa, Daren Zha, Jun Xiao