arXiv:2608. 01095v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Federated learning (FL) enables multiple intelligent devices to collaboratively train a high-accuracy model without sharing raw data.
By Hongliang Zhang, Zhongyuan Yu, Fenghua Xu, Teng Hu, Jian Meng, Jiguo Yu
The paper introduces a protocol for auditing and composing reinforcement‑learning policies using discrete behavioral rules, defining auditability through six testable predicates such as trace integrity and rule coverage. Experiments show that overlapping rule sets do not guarantee behavioral agreement, and that rule‑based fusion often fails to outperform value‑based composition, highlighting limitations in current description layers. The authors provide an evidence‑bounded audit framework and outline future directions for more robust skill composition.
By Liu Hung Ming
arXiv:2607. 08651v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Decentralized federated learning (DFL) removes the central server by letting nodes exchange model updates through peer-to-peer gossip, but existing gossip-based methods often lack provenance finality and resilience to Byzantine or lazy participants.
By Amirhossein Taherpour, Xiaodong Wang
ESCROW is a post‑deployment maintenance framework for large‑language‑model agents that operate under policy‑bound enterprise workflows. It ensures that any skill revisions proposed by the LLM are only deployed after empirical evaluation, using distributed diagnosis, consensus, per‑category non‑regression guards, cross‑cycle anti‑regression checks, and an accuracy–cost Pareto search to produce a versioned, auditable diff for each change. In a real production financial document‑auditing system, ESCROW achieved the best accuracy–cost trade‑off compared with baseline methods and demonstrated transferability on a public $ au$‑bench.
By Ruoqi Shu, Chen Dan, Xuhui Wang, Tianhua Xu, Mengxi Luo, Yanming Mai, Bo Wan
arXiv:2607. 09259v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Telecom fraud-control studies often stop at detector-level classification, but deployment use requires request-level policy resolution, lifecycle traceability, and auditability.
By Saviz Changizi, Nasibeh Mohammadzadeh, Mohammad Shojafar, Rahim Tafazolli
The paper introduces Open-1B, a language model trained under a new fully auditable regime that ensures every training operation is reproducible on heterogeneous commodity hardware with bitwise certainty. By enforcing a fixed order on sources of nondeterminism—GPU reductions, data batch ordering, and inter/intra-node communication—the authors enable auditors to replay and verify individual training steps on a single machine. The release includes the full pretraining dataset, all intermediate checkpoints, the training codebase, and an audit harness for step-by-step verification.
By John Donaghy, Brian Wilcox, O\u{g}uzhan Ersoy, Shikhar Rastogi, Adam St Arnaud, Alexey Titov, Jordan Greenberg, Ben Fielding, Harry Grieve
The paper introduces PACE (Policy‑Attested Contract Execution), a framework that sits between large‑language‑model (LLM) based autonomous AI agents and on‑chain DeFi operations. PACE defines typed transaction intents, a deterministic policy verifier, and signed Policy Decision Records (PDRs) that cryptographically bind an approved intent, policy, and simulation report to the exact on‑chain execution bytes, providing replay and expiration protection. In evaluations across 40 tasks and six baselines, PACE achieves zero unsafe executions and zero false positives, outperforming unguarded agents by a large margin.
By Rabimba Karanjai (Larry), Yang Lu (Larry), Richard Williamson (Larry), Hemanth Hm (Larry), Prakhar Mehrotra (Larry), Lei Xu (Larry), Weidong (Larry), Shi
The paper presents a deployed system that scores blockchain addresses using their position in a massive multi‑chain transaction graph instead of relying on sanctions lists. The system operates on a single graph of 835 million addresses and 15.8 billion edges across five EVM chains, employing a shared inductive encoder with per‑chain normalization and two scoring heads. It demonstrates label‑free transfer, achieving high recall on held‑out positives for Base, Arbitrum, and Gnosis at a very low alert rate, and shows significant lead time over external registry events, while maintaining fast, reproducible serving performance.
By Yury Korolev
arXiv:2606. 10241v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Autonomous improvement loops are hard to trust because the improvement process is usually external scaffolding bolted onto the agent: failures go unlogged, diagnoses cannot be replayed, and promote-or-discard decisions land in a side database rather than the agent's own history.
By Yohei Nakajima
arXiv:2607. 09682v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: AI systems are increasingly used to assist consequential decisions in regulated domains such as auditing, finance, and healthcare.
By Vimal Nakrani
arXiv:2609.37011v1 Announce Type: cross
Abstract: Federated learning enables multiple clients to collaboratively train models without sharing their private data. However, the lack of visibility into...
By Hongxu Su, Jianzhu Yao, Xuechao Wang, Pramod Viswanath
The paper presents a compliance screening system that evaluates blockchain addresses by their position in a large multi‑chain transaction graph instead of relying on sanctions lists. Using a single graph of 835 million addresses and 15.8 billion edges across five EVM chains, the system employs a shared inductive encoder with per‑chain normalization and two scoring heads, with decision thresholds set as exact quantiles of the score distribution. The authors demonstrate label‑free transfer, achieving high recall on held‑out positives for Base, Arbitrum, and Gnosis, and report significant lead‑time in flagging external registry events, efficient serving latency, and robustness checks against adversarial behavior.