Vibe-driven model-based engineering
arXiv:2604. 10645v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: There is a pressing need for better development methods and tools to keep up with the growing demand and increasing complexity of new software systems.
arXiv:2606. 18293v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Thanks to rapid developments in generative AI, we are in the midst of a paradigm shift that may change how we interact with computers forever.
arXiv:2604. 10645v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: There is a pressing need for better development methods and tools to keep up with the growing demand and increasing complexity of new software systems.
The study evaluates Vibe Coding, an AI‑led conversational programming paradigm that lets developers generate software via natural‑language interaction with large language models. In a mixed‑methods experiment with 30 participants, Vibe Coding improved development efficiency—reducing task completion time by 27% versus traditional coding and 12% versus AI‑assisted coding—while also yielding a good usability score (SUS = 71.4) and moderate cognitive workload (NASA‑TLX = 55.5). However, the gains came with trade‑offs: lower maintainability indices, higher security vulnerabilities, and themes of trust calibration, loss of control, and prompt‑engineering strategy emerged, leading the authors to propose a three‑pillar framework for responsible adoption.
The paper introduces SUSVIBES, a benchmark of 186 real‑world software engineering tasks where human programmers have committed vulnerable code. It evaluates 12 popular coding‑agent settings on these tasks and finds that all agents perform poorly in terms of security, with only 11.8% of solutions from SWE‑Agent with Claude 4 Sonnet being secure despite 57% being functionally correct. Attempts to mitigate security issues by adding vulnerability hints to the prompts do not improve results.
arXiv:2608. 16318v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Recent advances in Generative Artificial Intelligence (GenAI) have substantially improved the ability of large language models (LLMs) to generate and explain source code.
The unified agent for long-horizon productivity and coding, launching with Work and Code modes. Plus, a new Vibe VS Code extension.
arXiv:2606. 08676v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: AI coding assistants have significantly improved developer productivity by automatically suggesting code that aligns with user intent, and many of these tools are now integrated directly into Integrated Development Environments (IDEs).
arXiv:2604. 14137v3 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Evaluating LLMs is challenging, as benchmark scores often fail to capture models' real-world usefulness.
arXiv:2608. 06640v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: The widespread integration of AI coding assistants offers undeniable boosts to engineering velocity.
arXiv:2506. 13932v3 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: The rise of large language models (LLMs) has led to dramatic improvements across a wide range of natural language tasks.
arXiv:2606. 19042v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: In vibe coding, an emerging AI-driven paradigm, an LLM generates an entire program from a natural language prompt, but what happens to the variability that traditional software engineering carefully builds into code?
arXiv:2607. 24757v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: This paper reports on the rapid development and classroom deployment of a Thonny log visualizer built using AI-assisted ``vibe coding'' to make students' programming processes easily visible to teachers.
The study examines how adding a security-requirements section to prompts affects web applications generated by a large language model. Six distinct applications were produced twice—once with a baseline prompt and once with a security-aware prompt—yielding 12 programs. Analysis of these programs revealed 75 confirmed security findings, with the security-aware variants showing fewer issues (24 vs. 51) and no Critical or High severity problems.