The article argues that agentic auto‑research should be guided by dense, intermediate signals of epistemic progress rather than by sparse final benchmarks. It compares this approach to fuzz testing, where coverage provides continuous feedback that directs input mutation. The authors propose controlled experiments to test whether such signals improve discovery efficiency and reduce false positives, and demonstrate in a simulated physics setting that an AI agent using feedback‑driven search uncovers a hidden law while optimization‑driven baselines fail.
By Yifeng He, Jicheng Wang, Yinzhe Zhao, Chengyang Shi, Jiachen Liu, Hao Chen
Autonomous scientific research agents are increasingly applied to end-to-end scientific workflows, including literature review, data analysis, experimentation, and report generation. However, open-end...
arXiv:2608.31076v1 Announce Type: cross
Abstract: Autonomous scientific research agents are increasingly applied to end-to-end scientific workflows, including literature review, data analysis, experi...
By Xuehai Wang, Haowei Qin, Tongxin Liu, Junkai Li, Buqiang Xu, Jintian Zhang, Yijun Chen, Zirui Xue, Shumin Deng
arXiv:2609.35561v2 Announce Type: replace
Abstract: Recursive self-improvement (RSI) seeks to enable AI systems to participate in improving their own capabilities. A concrete pathway is autonomous mo...
By Yaxin Du, Xiyuan Yang, Zhifan Zhou, Yujie Ge, Cheng Wang, Jiajun Wang, Sijie Chen, Zehui Liu, Yuxin Zhang, Weicheng Gu, Julian Zhang, Zixing Lei, Siheng Chen
arXiv:2608. 06714v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Recent systems for optimizing prompts, programs, and ML workflows typically rely on explicit outer-loop controllers such as evolutionary search, bandits, or textual-gradient methods.
By Junbo Li, Boyi Liu, Canwen Xu, Yite Wang, Yuxiong He, Zhangyang Wang, Qiang Liu, Zhewei Yao
AutoResearch is a two‑stage autonomous research system that links Idea Generation with Idea Execution. In the generation phase it blends new research signals with existing domain knowledge, identifies transferable mechanistic insights, and produces grounded, testable research plans through multi‑model generation and cross‑review. The execution phase then decomposes these plans into experiments, iteratively implements and diagnoses them, and uses independent evidence‑based review to accept or revise conclusions, thereby turning ideas into measurable progress while minimizing hallucinations.
By Yiming Ren, Xiang Liu, Qumeng Sun, Xiao Zhang, Jiahao Li, Haoyang Zhang, Junjie Wang
The paper introduces AgentX-Model, a dual‑agent framework that links proposal development with model experimentation in industrial recommender systems. The Research Agent drafts proposals from literature and prior findings, while the Model Agent runs multi‑round experiments, returning code, metrics, and open questions. The framework iteratively selects starting implementations and formulates new research questions, organizing work into Reproduce, Follow‑up, Composition, and Diagnose actions. Across production evaluations, most experiments exceeded business baselines, with recent A/B tests showing significant gains in acquisition efficiency, advertising spend, and watch time while reducing computational cost.
By Shuang Yang, Zijie Zhuang, Changxin Lao, Pengbo Xu, Hanwen Xu, Yusheng Huang, Han Gao, Guanchen Wang, Tianbao Ma, Linxun Chen, Peilin Song, Xuming Wang, Chen Li, Fan Wu, Tao Wang, Zibo Zhao, Xiangyu Wu, An Liu, Fei Pan, Peng Jiang, Chen Yang, Zhaojie Liu, Wenwu Ou
Recent systems for optimizing prompts, programs, and ML workflows typically rely on explicit outer-loop controllers such as evolutionary search, bandits, or textual-gradient methods. We ask a fundamentally different question: how much of this search policy can be internalized by a single tool-using agent?
arXiv:2609.08248v1 Announce Type: new
Abstract: Modern industrial ads ranking stacks are increasingly bottlenecked not by model capacity or training compute, but by the throughput of human ML iterati...
By Erwin Gao, Vinodh Kumar Sunkara, Jingyi Guan, Qinjin Jia, Hangjun Xu, Xiang Ji, Sherman Wong, Surya Teja Chavali, Pratik Vaishnavi, Aryan Pandhi, Xiaoyu Deng, Zhaodong Wang, Samarth Inani, Fan Yang, Jakob Moberg, Zoe Zu, Nicolas Bievre, Sami Khenissi, Amit Jaspal, Ehsan Fakharizadi, Srinidhi Viswanathan, Dorothy Sun, Abishek Vanam, Sneha Iyer, Sheela Yadawad, Wenjie Chen, Gaby Nahum, Junhua Gu, Peter Chu, Yucheng Liu, Xin Zhao, Vitor Cid, Chaorong Chen, Vijay Pappu, Ashwin Kumar, Wenlin Chen, Ben Schulte, Deepak Chandra, Ritwik Tewari
Auto-RecSys is an autonomous research system designed to scale long-horizon experimentation for industry‑scale recommendation models. It tackles long feedback loops and system complexity by enabling distributed asynchronous execution, centralized cross‑server memory, and a cognitive‑procedural separation that combines natural‑language skill files with deterministic scripts. The system incorporates a dual‑loop self‑evolving architecture—Execution Evolution and Idea Evolution loops—to refine operational playbooks and guide future experiments, thereby reducing human effort per cycle and improving reliability as playbooks mature.
By Ming Li, Dai Li, Xuying Ning, Bo Sun, Rui Li, Yi Zhang, Silvia Gong, Xuan Cao, Rui Li, Cornelia Carapcea, Qunshu Zhang, Zhigang Wang, Yinglong Xia, Andy Wang
arXiv:2607. 02520v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Automated research agents increasingly generate code, retrieve literature, and draft scientific artifacts, but they often fail to verify whether generated experiments execute correctly or whether cited sources support generated claims.
By Rajesh Kumar, Waqar Ali, Junaid Ahmed, Abdullah Aman Khan, Shaoning Zeng
Scientific progress depends on a repeated loop of exploration, experimentation, and abstraction. Researchers test candidate directions, interpret the evidence, and carry the resulting lessons into later attempts.