arXiv AI
Learning to Evaluate Before Improving: Automatic Rubric Induction for Automatic Research Agents
Read the original on arXiv AI →The Flow has not summarised this story yet — read it at arXiv AI.
Related stories
Hugging Face Trending Papers
Aug 31
Learning to Evaluate Before Improving: Automatic Rubric Induction for Automatic Research Agents
Autonomous scientific research agents are increasingly applied to end-to-end scientific workflows, including literature review, data analysis, experimentation, and report generation. However, open-end...
arXiv AI
4d ago
ResearchFlow-Eval: Tracing the Execution Gap in End-to-End Multi-Claim Autoresearch
arXiv:2610.18088v2 Announce Type: new Abstract: Autoresearch systems increasingly undertake entire research projects. In practice, scientific research requires systems to pursue multiple interdepende...
arXiv AI
Jun 9
ResearchClawBench: A Benchmark for End-to-End Autonomous Scientific Research
arXiv:2606. 07591v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: AI coding agents are increasingly used for scientific work, but their end-to-end autonomous research capability remains difficult to verify.
arXiv AI
Aug 19
AutoResearch: Insight In, Hallucination Out
AutoResearch is a two‑stage autonomous research system that links Idea Generation with Idea Execution. In the generation phase it blends new research signals with existing domain knowledge, identifies transferable mechanistic insights, and produces grounded, testable research plans through multi‑model generation and cross‑review. The execution phase then decomposes these plans into experiments, iteratively implements and diagnoses them, and uses independent evidence‑based review to accept or revise conclusions, thereby turning ideas into measurable progress while minimizing hallucinations.
arXiv AI
Aug 25
The Greatness of Science Cannot Be Planned: Agentic Auto-Research is Fuzz Testing
The article argues that agentic auto‑research should be guided by dense, intermediate signals of epistemic progress rather than by sparse final benchmarks. It compares this approach to fuzz testing, where coverage provides continuous feedback that directs input mutation. The authors propose controlled experiments to test whether such signals improve discovery efficiency and reduce false positives, and demonstrate in a simulated physics setting that an AI agent using feedback‑driven search uncovers a hidden law while optimization‑driven baselines fail.
arXiv AI
Jun 24
CORE-Bench: Fostering the Credibility of Published Research Through a Computational Reproducibility Agent Benchmark
arXiv:2409. 11363v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: AI agents have the potential to aid users on a variety of consequential tasks, including conducting scientific research.