arXiv:2607. 23753v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Partial differential equation (PDE) discovery aims to identify from data the governing law of a physical system.
The paper introduces a new type of data‑poisoning attack called a wrong‑physics backdoor, which tricks neural PDE operators into selecting a solution from the same PDE family but with an incorrect physical parameter. By relinking a surrogate input’s supervision to a cached alternate‑parameter solution, the attack keeps the output physically plausible yet wrong for the intended parameter. Experiments on 476 campaigns across several PDEs and models (FNO, DeepONet, Transformer, GRU, LSTM) show high success rates while maintaining low clean error, revealing a validation gap in current practices.
arXiv:2608.22026v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Accurate simulation of the long-time evolution of systems governed by partial differential equations (PDEs) is central to scientific computing. Among e...
arXiv:2512. 19643v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Numerical simulation of time-dependent partial differential equations (PDEs) is central to scientific and engineering applications, but high-fidelity solvers are often prohibitively expensive for long-horizon or time-critical settings.
arXiv:2508. 09156v3 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: We present a framework for fine-tuning flow-matching generative models to enforce physical constraints and solve inverse problems in scientific systems.
arXiv:2602. 12706v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Neural operators have emerged as fast surrogate solvers for parametric partial differential equations (PDEs).
The paper introduces a method for selecting the best neural‑operator model during deployment without needing high‑fidelity reference solutions. By using a squared Hilbert‑space loss, the authors show that ranking a finite library of models depends only on the low‑dimensional span of candidate differences, enabling simultaneous scoring of all models with a single anchor‑based linearized response of the governing equation. This shared physical diagnostic accurately recovered over 99.6% of pairwise preferences and 99.0% of optimal checkpoints across diverse Fourier and convolutional operator libraries for fluid, reaction‑diffusion, and wave dynamics, and often outperformed the best individual candidates.
arXiv:2606. 17460v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Neural operators are widely used as surrogate solution maps for partial differential equations (PDEs), but full-size models can be costly to store, deploy, and evaluate in many-query scientific workflows.
arXiv:2506. 20181v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: We study operator relevance in data-driven partial differential equation (PDE) discovery.
The paper presents a theoretical framework for certifying the accuracy of physics‑informed neural networks (PINNs) used to solve partial differential equations. It derives generalization bounds that link the residual loss minimized during training to the actual error in the solution space, showing that if the neural approximation stays within a compact subset, a vanishing residual guarantees convergence to the true solution. Deterministic and probabilistic convergence results are provided, offering explicit error guarantees based on residual, boundary, and initial condition errors.
The paper evaluates the robustness of Physics‑Informed Neural Networks (PINNs) against noisy data in inverse problems, comparing them to a finite element method (FEM) plus optimizer baseline. Experiments on viscosity identification in 1D Burgers’ equation and 2D/3D Taylor‑Green Vortex with additive Gaussian noise show that PINNs, while requiring less human expertise, are outperformed by the traditional FEM approach in accuracy (e.g., RMSE 0.01 vs. 0.0013 for 2D Taylor‑Green with σ=1). PINNs do, however, exhibit better scaling with problem complexity, and the study highlights specific training failures that must be addressed for PINNs to become more competitive.
arXiv:2604. 07366v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Partial differential equations (PDEs) govern nearly every physical process in science and engineering, but solving them at scale remains prohibitively expensive.