arXiv:2608. 05026v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: High-quality annotation of artworks is essential for computational art research, yet extracting implicit semantics remains challenging due to the reliance on culturally grounded meanings and deep contextual knowledge behind the images.
By Xiaoyan Gu, Yifang Wang, Wenqing Zheng, Haozhong Liu, Yixia Zheng, Peiyi Jiang, Wenjie Ning, Wei Zhang, Wei Chen
Abstract4D is the largest dataset of abstract paintings, containing over 120,000 images with rich metadata and multi‑dimensional prompts that capture perceptual attributes such as form, color, texture, and composition. The dataset is annotated via a hybrid human–VLM pipeline to ensure quality and consistency. Using Abstract4D, the authors analyze the semantic structure of abstract art through large‑scale embedding visualization and establish benchmark tasks for classification, cross‑modal retrieval, and text‑to‑image generation to evaluate AI models’ perception and reproduction of abstract visual language.
By Haowei Zhang, Yuanpei Zhao, Ji-Zhe Zhou, Mao Li
The paper introduces ExpArt-KG, a knowledge graph tailored to the artwork domain, and a retrieval‑augmented generation framework that alternates between generating answers and retrieving relevant facts from the graph. By using a correctness judgment to guide the search, the method efficiently gathers the necessary factual information, improving the detail of image explanations while reducing external knowledge retrieval costs. Experimental results demonstrate that the approach maintains generation quality comparable to fixed‑iteration methods.
By Yuta Kato, Shintaro Ozaki, Kazuki Hayashi, Yusuke Sakai, Hidetaka Kamigaito, Katsuhiko Hayashi, Taro Watanabe
The aim of this paper is twofold. First, it investigates whether newer generative models are getting better at pastiching contemporary artworks.
Understanding how artworks are created requires reasoning about the iterative decisions, material operations, and contextual influences that shape artistic production. While recent generative AI systems can synthesize artworks with high fidelity, they primarily model distributions over finished artifacts rather than the creative processes underlying their creation.
arXiv:2607. 08331v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Understanding how artworks are created requires reasoning about the iterative decisions, material operations, and contextual influences that shape artistic production.
By Kaustubh Kumar, Ashutosh Ranjan, Vivek Srivastava, Blessin Varkey, Shirish Karande
Artistic image synthesis aims to recreate the expressive visual identity of a target artist, yet existing methods often fail to capture an artist's global style. Conventional style transfer methods transfer the style of one or a few reference artworks to a content image in a One-to-One manner, making them effective for artwork-level stylization but limited in representing the broader stylistic distribution of an artist.
arXiv:2608. 14435v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Frozen image embeddings from models such as CLIP are increasingly used to classify paintings by art-historical style, with high reported accuracy.
By Rory Ashton
arXiv:2607. 05841v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Structured representation can characterize semantic objects and relationships in images.
By Zhiguang Zhou, Fengling Zheng, Miaoxin Hu, Lina You, Jin Wen, Huan Liu, Wei Zhang, Dekun Qian, Yuhua Liu, Wei Chen, Yigang Wang, Yong Wang
arXiv:2608. 06751v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Artist-grounded image generation requires more than appending an artist name to a prompt.
By Kuan Xing, Ye Wang, Changyi Gan, Yuheng Li, Thao Nguyen, Yi Chang, Yilin Wang
arXiv:2606. 09846v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Visual art remains largely inaccessible to blind and low-vision (BLV) audiences due to brief or absent alt-text, which rarely conveys the sensory, spatial, or emotional qualities of an artwork.
By Vignesh Nagarajan
Composition, the deliberate arrangement of visual elements, is central to how meaning, emotion, and aesthetic quality are conveyed in artwork, yet it remains among the least formalized dimensions of visual understanding. Prior work highlights a persistent gap in learning meaningful compositional representations, attributing it to semantic bias and suggesting that human-inspired approaches may be key.