arXiv:2601.22984v3 Announce Type: replace
Abstract: Diagnosing failure patterns in Deep Research Agents (DRAs) remains a critical challenge. Existing benchmarks predominantly rely on end-to-end evalu...
By Yuhao Zhan, Tianyu Fan, Linxuan Huang, Zirui Guo, Chao Huang
arXiv:2605.27068v2 Announce Type: replace-cross
Abstract: Social deduction games have become a popular testbed for probing reasoning, deception, coordination, and belief modeling in Large Language Mo...
By Ye Yuan, Rui Song, Weien Li, Zeyu Li, Haochen Liu, Xiangyu Kong, Changjiang Han, Yonghan Yang, Zichen Zhao, Zixuan Dong, Fuyuan Lyu, Bowei He, Haolun Wu, Jikun Kang, Xue Liu
arXiv:2606. 09878v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Standard benchmarks report aggregate accuracy, but practitioners need to know which specific capabilities a model lacks.
By Nicholas Saban
The paper introduces SCHEMA, a topology‑aware evaluation framework designed to assess hallucinations in large language model agents used for scientific research. SCHEMA builds scientific concept graphs from benchmark seeds and literature evidence, then generates graph‑grounded tasks such as claim verification, multi‑hop reasoning, open‑ended explanation, and experimental code generation. It evaluates agents using a trajectory hallucination pipeline that assigns a topology‑weighted severity score and a multi‑agent counterfactual attribution module that identifies the causal mechanisms behind failures. The study finds that hallucinations tend to cluster around highly connected knowledge hubs and that a model’s final accuracy can be misleading, as correct answers may arise from structurally flawed reasoning.
"whyItMatters":"The findings highlight that terminal accuracy alone is insufficient for high‑stakes scientific applications, underscoring the need for mechanism‑level evaluation grounded in knowledge topology."
By Xinshun Feng, Ziqi Miao, Lijun Li, Jing Shao
arXiv:2606. 24589v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Scaling adversarial evaluation of large language models requires both a method for generating hard inputs and a reliable way to confirm that resulting failures are real.
By Khanak Khandelwal (Indian Institute of Technology Jodhpur)
arXiv:2608. 19206v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Contemporary Large Language Models (LLMs) are increasingly aligned to suppress hallucinations, prioritizing factual retrieval over combinatorial creativity.
By Nicolas Rodriguez-Alvarez (IES Parquesol, Valladolid, Spain)
arXiv:2607. 17883v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Enterprises will not deploy AI agents they cannot trust, and the most-cited reason for distrust is hallucination: confident, fluent output that is simply not true.
By Bogdan Raduta, Horia Velicu, Alexandru Preda, Serban Chiricescu
As large language models are increasingly deployed as tool-augmented legal agents, they introduce agentic hallucinations where tool-call and reasoning errors cascade into fabricated holdings and misci...
LexAgentHallu is a new benchmark that profiles hallucinations in legal agents across multi-step interactions. It contains 3,414 instances spanning 17 legal categories and 6 task types, each annotated with a dual-layer taxonomy of 7 high-level and 27 fine-grained hallucination categories. The benchmark introduces fine-grained metrics to quantify and localize failures along an agent’s execution path, revealing patterns such as the Right-Answer-Wrong-Reason effect and clustered hallucination subclasses.
By Yujin Zhou, Mingxuan Zheng, Chuxue Cao, Huang Yidan, Jiale Chen, Yike Guo, Sirui Han
arXiv:2606. 24976v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Foundation-model agents in multi-step, open-ended environments frequently suffer from compounding errors, where early mistakes contaminate long-horizon trajectories.
By Pradyumna Narayana, Sana Ayromlou, Purvi Sehgal
arXiv:2604. 16706v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Automated evaluation of tool-using large language model (LLM) agents is widely assumed to be reliable, yet this assumption is rarely validated against human annotation.
By Bhaskar Gurram
The paper introduces the SAST-IR framework to evaluate large language models’ robustness against persuasion attacks in a memory‑less setting, revealing a flaw called "Refusal Inertia" that masks true vulnerability. Using the CP‑Agent and a custom CounterFact‑Strict dataset, the authors demonstrate that simple, diverse attack strategies achieve a 96% success rate, while complex attacks often trigger defensive compliance. The study highlights severe brittleness in current state‑of‑the‑art models when deprived of conversation history.
By Zhuoang Cai