The paper introduces a progressive training strategy for embodied vision‑language models aimed at reducing spatio‑temporal hallucinations. It first creates a Chain‑of‑Thought dataset that breaks complex reasoning into detailed spatiotemporal steps, then uses supervised pre‑training on this dataset followed by fine‑tuning with weakly‑labeled data. Experiments show the method improves backbone accuracy and narrows the forward‑backward performance gap from over 70% to 6.53%, indicating stronger dynamic reasoning and fewer temporal biases.
By Xiaoda Yang, Shuai Yang, Can Wang, Jingyang Xue, Menglan Tang, Checheng Yu, Xunzhe Zhou, Sashuai Zhou, Tao Jin, Lixin Yang, Xiangyu Yue, Zhou Zhao
arXiv:2608.27871v1 Announce Type: new
Abstract: Long-video understanding remains challenging for Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) due to limited context length. Uniform sampling may miss cruc...
By Ziling Huang, Shin'ichi Satoh
arXiv:2606. 29023v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Spatio-temporal grounding in long videos requires precise temporal localization and robust object tracking conditioned on natural-language queries.
By Tianshu Zhang, Yan Wang, Ji Qi, Lijie Wen
arXiv:2606. 29416v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Can a vision model truly see an object, or does it only fit surface-level visual cues?
By Xingyu Peng, Junran Wu, Yue Hou, Zhongliang Qiao, Jiaheng Liu, Shangzhe Li, Jichang Zhao, Wenjun Wu, Xianglong Liu, Yongxin Tong, Li Dong, Ke Xu
The paper introduces structured video prompting, a training‑free inference‑time technique that augments input videos with lightweight spatial and temporal structure to provide explicit anchors for evidence organization. By applying this method to two video benchmarks and two open video‑language models, the authors demonstrate performance improvements across several tasks, with gains varying by model and task. The study suggests that failures in video‑language models stem not only from reasoning capacity but also from how video evidence is presented during inference.
By Sadegh Mohammadian
arXiv:2606. 00987v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Large Vision-Language Models (LVLMs) have shown strong visual understanding and language-guided grounding abilities, yet their capacity for multi-temporal visual reasoning remains underexplored.
By Bingyu Li, Da Zhang, Tao Huo, Zhiyuan Zhao, Junyu Gao, Xuelong Li
arXiv:2608. 13344v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Long-horizon Earth observation reasoning requires models to organize multi-stage geographic evolution, localize spatial changes, detect temporal anomalies, and infer future from extended image sequences.
By Yupan Ding, Jing Xiao, Zhenyuan Zhang, Chaofeng Chen, Liang Liao, Gui-Song Xia, Mi Wang
arXiv:2606. 05702v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Recent advancements in Vision-Language Models (VLMs) have significantly enhanced their ability to interpret complex visual semantics, yet their capacity for chronological reasoning remains under-explored.
By Haoyu Zhou, Qing Qing, Caichong Li, Qixin Zhang, Yongcheng Jing, Ziqi Xu, Juncheng Hu, Xikun Zhang, Renqiang Luo
The paper introduces CLEAR, a CLoze-style rEAsoning-based Re-ranking framework for Compositional Zero-Shot Learning. CLEAR treats primitive variations as context-driven activations of concrete visual cues rather than independent entities, extracting conditional variants in a coarse-to-fine manner and performing cloze-style reasoning to infer high-level semantics. Experiments show that CLEAR consistently improves base models and surpasses state-of-the-art methods on the C-GQA and MIT-States datasets.
By Weize Li, Zhicheng Zhao, Fei Su
arXiv:2607. 14739v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Vision-Language-Action (VLA) models have achieved impressive results in visuomotor policy learning, yet remain fundamentally reactive, mapping current observations and language to actions without explicit forward prediction of world dynamics.
By Wei Li, Peijin Jia, Yuan Ma, Xuefeng Jiang, Titong Jiang, Sheng Sun, Yujian Li, Xin Wen, Han Hong, Zhikang Liu, Bailin Li, Kun Zhan
arXiv:2607. 03595v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Affordance grounding aims to localize image regions that support a specific action, serving as a core capability for physical intelligence and embodied perception.
By Seung Il Lee, Qinqian Lei, Daguang Xu, Dong Yang, Robby T. Tan, Yixin Chen, Bo Wang
MVVBench is a new benchmark for multi‑view video reasoning that tests vision‑language models on tasks requiring integration of spatial and temporal evidence across multiple, often non‑overlapping camera streams. The benchmark contains questions that cannot be answered from any single view or single moment, forcing models to jointly reason across views and time. It evaluates six capabilities—including attribute identification, relative distance, camera pose, and compositional counting—and provides human‑authored QA, rigorous verification, and detailed error analysis.
"whyItMatters":"The benchmark offers a rigorous evaluation of 4D multi‑view reasoning and a foundation for future progress toward reliable embodied perception."
By Hyungjin Chung, Byeongjun Park, Joonseok Lee, Hojun Kim, Jaeho Choi, Byung-Hoon Kim