arXiv:2606. 01666v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: The scaling of Large Language Models (LLMs) has driven significant performance gains but created substantial challenges in inference efficiency.
By Udbhav Bamba, Arnav Chavan, Aryamaan Thakur, Steve Teig, Deepak Gupta
arXiv:2602. 05970v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Neural scaling laws relate loss to model size in large language models (LLMs), yet depth and width may contribute to performance differently, requiring more detailed studies.
By Yizhou Liu, Sara Kangaslahti, Ziming Liu, Jeff Gore
arXiv:2608. 13596v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Heterogeneous model fusion seeks to combine models that differ in tasks, initializations, architectures, or scales.
By Jiahe Fan, Si Chen, Yinghao Hou, Aiyuan Zhang, Hong Xie
arXiv:2511. 04981v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Model depth is a double-edged sword in deep learning: deeper models achieve higher accuracy but require higher computational cost.
By Zhiqi Bu
arXiv:2602.09009v2 Announce Type: replace-cross
Abstract: Scaling network depth has been a central driver behind the success of modern foundation models, yet recent investigations suggest that deep l...
By Yilang Zhang, Bingcong Li, Niao He, Georgios B. Giannakis
arXiv:2606. 16112v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Residual architectures are ubiquitous in deep learning, but they suffer from a subtle structural limitation: the norm of the residual stream can grow rapidly with depth.
By Tom\'as Figliolia, Beren Millidge
FlowGenesis is a framework that lets neural networks self‑organize their architecture during training by adding or removing neurons based on a local statistic called Representation Flux. Neurons with high Flux are split to preserve function, while low‑Flux, low‑activity neurons are pruned. Experiments on image and text classification show that networks starting from different sizes converge to similar neuron counts and performance, and the method also improves continual learning by reducing parameters for new tasks without sacrificing accuracy.
By Maksim A Kazanskii
Scaling Large Language Models (LLMs) has been driven mainly by enlarging the Transformer backbone, but for an already-strong model this requires another round of costly pretraining. We study whether an existing backbone can keep improving by allocating more computation to each token while leaving the Transformer backbone fixed.
arXiv:2602. 07494v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Deeper modern architectures are costly to train, making hyperparameter transfer preferable to expensive repeated tuning.
By Shenxi Wu, Haosong Zhang, Xingjian Ma, Shirui Bian, Yichi Zhang, Xi Chen, Wei Lin
The paper investigates the often-overlooked scale vectors in large language models, showing that despite their tiny size they are crucial for pre‑training performance. The authors provide theoretical insights that scale vectors mainly aid optimization rather than expressivity, and they analyze how weight decay affects different normalization layers. Building on these findings, they propose lightweight improvements—branch‑specific heterogeneity, better placement, and magnitude‑direction reparameterization—that consistently reduce loss across a range of model sizes and training settings.
By Mingze Wang, Shuchen Zhu, Yuxin Fang, Binghui Li, Kai Shen, Shu Zhong
arXiv:2605. 04913v4 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: LLM post-training typically propagates task gradients through the full depth of the model.
By Hengyu Shi, Tianyang Han, Peizhe Wang, Zhiling Wang, Xu Yang, Junhao Su
arXiv:2610.19247v1 Announce Type: new
Abstract: Transformers are intuitively considered to be efficient at copying from their inputs. We actually show that the ability of LLMs to copy in context can...
By Nathan Godey, Yoav Artzi